Throughout history from biblical times to now, the Ishmaelites known as the Arabs have caused physical, mental and spiritual torment towards Hebrews and Hammites (known as Africans) through slavery, torture, pedophilia, murder, racism, humiliation, oppression, theft and much more. Ishmaelites have shown a vehement hatred and disgust towards Hebrews and Hammites for hundreds, if not thousands of years in history. This hatred is still present among Arabs. The question some will have is why.
Sowing the Seed of Contempt:
The hatred that Ishmaelites have towards Hebrews stems from biblical history. In the book of Genesis, it details the story of Abraham or Abram. Before he was named as Abraham by the Most High, Abram had a wife named Sarai. The Most High had promised him many descendants and his offspring would be as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore. However, Sarai was barren and could not bear children for ten years even after the Most High had given his promise to Abram. Considering that she was barren, Sarai would tell her husband, Abram to bear a son with her maidservant, Hagar who was an Egyptian.
Genesis Chapter 16:2
2 And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai.
Hagar would bear Abram a son, Ishmael. However, a resentment would spring between Sarai and Hagar soon after.
Genesis Chapter 16:4-6
4And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived: and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes.
5And Sarai said unto Abram, My wrong be upon thee: I have given my maid into thy bosom; and when she saw that she had conceived, I was despised in her eyes: the LORD judge between me and thee.
6But Abram said unto Sarai, Behold, thy maid is in thy hand; do to her as it pleaseth thee. And when Sarai dealt hardly with her, she fled from her face.
Hagar developed contempt towards Sarai, prompting her to speak with Abram. While the reason for Hagar’s despise towards Sarai was not specified, it could be pieced together when understanding this from a psychological perspective. Since Hagar conceived, she would have become aware of Sarai’s inability to bear a child. It is possible that Hagar bearing Abram’s first-born son made her feel she was better and more superior as a woman than Sarai in her eyes. Also, she might have felt that being a an Egyptian woman made her more superior than Sarai and that she shouldn’t have to be the maid serving a Hebrew man and woman in her own land and that it should be the other way around; thus breeding the contempt. Remember, the Egyptians always had a stern prejudice and superiority complex towards Hebrews. Even when Joseph was king in Egypt, the Egyptians did not sit down and eat together with the Hebrews. Many women also can be very emotional directly after giving birth through something commonly known as postpartum depression. These may have all been factors which led to Hagar’s contempt manifesting itself against Sarai.
Nevertheless, Sarai would be given the authority by Abram to deal with Hagar however she pleased. Sarai rightfully was stern towards Hagar; leading her to flee. An angel sent from The Most High would meet with Hagar and turn her back to Abram and Sarai for it was apart of the Most High’s plan for her to bear Ishmael.
Genesis Chapter 16:7-12
7And the angel of the LORD found her by a fountain of water in the wilderness, by the fountain in the way to Shur.
8And he said, Hagar, Sarai’s maid, whence camest thou? and whither wilt thou go? And she said, I flee from the face of my mistress Sarai.
9And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands.
10And the angel of the LORD said unto her, I will multiply thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.
11And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
12And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
Ishmael’s seed would turn to be wild down the road. We will expound on this later.
Sarai would later give birth to Isaac. The reason why Isaac was cherished more than Ishmael was because the birth of Isaac was of the will of the Most High for he was born to fulfill the sacred promise. The birth of Ishmael was of human will as it was Sarai who convinced Abraham to have a child with Hagar. Also, Ishmael was a half-breed and not of a pure conception. Isaac was born of a pure conception from a Hebrew man and woman. The seed would not be muddled with Isaac and it would be kept purely in the Hebrew bloodline. It was also a miraculous conception due to Sarai being barren for so long and was finally able to give birth.
Ishmael’s jealousy and harshness towards Isaac would eventually culminate in him attempting to slay Isaac which would prompt Abraham and Sarah to kick him and Hagar out of their home.
Jasher Chapter 21:11-16
11 And Ishmael the son of Abraham was grown up in those days; he was fourteen years old when Sarah bare Isaac to Abraham.
12 And Yah was with Ishmael the son of Abraham, and he grew up, and he learned to use the bow and became an archer.
13 And when Isaac was five years old he was sitting with Ishmael at the door of the tent.
14 And Ishmael came to Isaac and seated himself opposite to him, and he took the bow and drew it and put the arrow in it, and intended to slay Isaac.
15 And Sarah saw the act which Ishmael desired to do to her son Isaac, and it grieved her exceedingly on account of her son, and she sent for Abraham, and said to him, Cast out this bondwoman and her son, for her son shall not be heir with my son, for thus did he seek to do unto him this day.
16 And Abraham hearkened to the voice of Sarah, and he rose up early in the morning, and he took twelve loaves and a bottle of water which he gave to Hagar, and sent her away with her son, and Hagar went with her son to the wilderness, and they dwelt in the wilderness of Paran with the inhabitants of the wilderness, and Ishmael was an archer, and he dwelt in the wilderness a long time.
Ishmael would grow to become an archer and would have two wives in the wilderness of Egypt and Canaan respectively. Abraham would visit Ishmael on two separate occassions during his time in the wilderness. Both occassions, Abraham never met Ishmael face to face as he was always gone off hunting. The first occassion in Egypt found Abraham talking to Ishmael’s first wife. She did not look at him at any point in time and did not even make an effort to bring bread or water when Abraham had requested drink due to his fatigue from the long journey. She would beat her children and curse Ishmael infront of Abraham, much to his displeasure. Upon seeing her treatment of Ishmael’s children and her disregard for her husband, Abraham knew that she was not motherly woman who would love his son and take care of his son’s children righteously. Abraham would tell her to send a message to him that entailed a parable which would tell him to send his wife away and to find a new wife for she was not a good mother.
Jasher Chapter 21:30-31
30 And Abraham said to Ishmael’s wife, When thy husband Ishmael returneth home say these words to him,
31 A very old man from the land of the Philistines came hither to seek thee, and thus was his appearance and figure; I did not ask him who he was, and seeing thou wast not here he spoke unto me and said, When Ishmael thy husband returneth tell him thus did this man say, When thou comest home put away this nail of the tent which thou hast placed here, and place another nail in its stead.
Three years later, Abraham would visit Ishmael once more in the wilderness of Canaan. Abraham would not find Ishmael as he would be hunting again. Abraham would have to speak to his wife once more; his second wife who he married after coming to Canaan after casting his first wife away. Unlike his first wife, she would offer Abraham food before he even had asked her. Abraham humbly declined to stop for a meal as he was in haste to carry on with his journey but did request water as he was thirsty. She would haste to bring him water and bread even though he had acknowledged that he didn’t have the time for bread. She urged him to eat and Abraham would eat and drink; bringing comfort to his heart. He would bless Ishmael and the Lord. He would tell her the message he intended to give to Ishmael. His message would entail a parable which would tell him that his wife was good and that his wife was to be kept.
Jasher Chapter 21:38-44
42 And he finished his meal and he blessed the Lord, and he said to Ishmael’s wife, When Ishmael cometh home say these words to him,
43 A very old man from the land of the Philistines came hither and asked after thee, and thou wast not here; and I brought him out bread and water and he ate and drank and his heart was comforted.
44 And he spoke these words to me: When Ishmael thy husband cometh home, say unto him, The nail of the tent which thou hast is very good, do not put it away from the tent.
Soon after, Ishmael and his wife and children would journey to dwell with his father for many days in the land of the Philistines (Jasher 22:1-3). The Most High had been with Ishmael and his mother throughout his entire duration in the wilderness (Genesis 21:17-20).
In spite of The Most High’s blessing and guidance in which he gave Ishmael, that did not stop him from expressing jealousy and a sense of competition towards his brother, Isaac.
Jasher Chapter 22:40-45
40 And Isaac the son of Abraham was growing up in those days, and Abraham his father taught him the way of the Lord to know the Lord, and the Lord was with him.
41 And when Isaac was thirty-seven years old, Ishmael his brother was going about with him in the tent.
42 And Ishmael boasted of himself to Isaac, saying, I was thirteen years old when the Lord spoke to my father to circumcise us, and I did according to the word of the Lord which he spoke to my father, and I gave my soul unto the Lord, and I did not transgress his word which he commanded my father.
43 And Isaac answered Ishmael, saying, Why dost thou boast to me about this, about a little bit of thy flesh which thou didst take from thy body, concerning which the Lord commanded thee?
44 As the Lord liveth, the Yah of my father Abraham, if the Lord should say unto my father, Take now thy son Isaac and bring him up an offering before me, I would not refrain but I would joyfully accede to it.
45 And the Lord heard the word that Isaac spoke to Ishmael, and it seemed good in the sight of the Lord, and he thought to try Abraham in this matter.
Isaac made a greater offering unto the Most High than Ishmael. While Ishmael adhered to the law that the Most High established to Abraham by undergoing circumcision at age 13, Isaac went beyond the law and willingly obliged in offering his own life as a burnt offering unto the Most High when He commanded Abraham to do so. Ishmael followed the law but Isaac’s deed was more noble and honorable as it showed that his love for the Most High was far greater than his own life.
Ishmael’s jealousy and envy of Isaac would linger on. He wished to be granted the inheritance from Abraham as he thought it was his right for he was the first born. This is shown in the book of Jasher when Ishmael expressed this to Abraham’s servant, Eliezer when Abraham and Isaac were going up to the mountains of Moriah to perform the burnt offering in which the Most High commanded them.
Jasher Chapter 23:22-23
22 And Ishmael said to Eliezer, Now my father Abraham is going with Isaac to bring him up for a burnt offering to the Lord, as He commanded him.
23 Now when he returneth he will give unto me all that he possesses, to inherit after him, for I am his first born.
For Ishmael to make that statement, he showed his coldness and indifference towards losing his brother, Isaac. He didn’t have true love for his younger half-brother Isaac and didn’t express any sort of compassion for him as it could have been the last time he would see him. Instead, he saw him as an obstacle blocking him from his purported inheritance. This is certainly another reason why Ishmael was not meant to be the one who would carry the seed of the Most High’s chosen. While Ishmael did follow the law and loved Abraham and the Most High, his contempt towards his brother would always keep him down from ever fully growing to be a truly righteous man. Hagar’s contempt towards Sarai was passed down to Ishmael which he would cast it against Sarai’s son, Isaac. This contempt of the Hebrews was always generally present within the Egyptians as they thought of themselves as gods and that they should hold reign over all nations. Passing this down to Hagar and then to Ishmael would let the seed of rancor and envy sprout within the bloodline of Ishmael.
Like their father, Ishmael, the Ishmaelites hold contempt towards the Hebrews. The Ishmaelites created Islam as a way to create power and rulership for themselves as a chosen people. They wrote Islam to favor Ishmael as the son who ‘Allah’ favored. Ibn Khatir, an Islamic historian made an account of the angel’s prophecy toward Hagar as the angel stating, “His hand would be over everyone, and the hand of everyone would be against him. His brethren would rule over all the lands.”
Let’s look at Genesis Chapter 16:12.
12And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
In comparison to the prophecy made by the angel in Genesis Chapter 16:12, the key difference is that the Islamic version stated Ishmael would rule over the lands whereas the book of Genesis stated that Ishmael shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
In the Islamic version, Ishmael was the one who would be taken to be a burnt offering by Abraham before ‘Allah’.
It is clear that Islam was written to exalt Ishmael as the progenitor of the Most High’s chosen people. Like Ishmael himself believed, they believed that since Ishmael was the first born of Abraham, that he should have inherited the blessing of the Most High. They were envious of Hebrews that they were the ones who received the promise and the inheritance of Abraham as the chosen people of the Lord. They inherited Ishmael’s contempt and belief in the inheritance as their birthright. By creating Islam, they would create a religion in which the “holy word” had declared Ishmael’s descendants as the chosen people of the Lord or ‘Allah’; giving them the power and right to express rulership over all nations. Billions of Muslims still strongly believe even at present time that the Arabs are the chosen.
This plot to create a whole new doctrine with Islam to proclaim the Ishmaelites as the chosen people of ‘Allah’ has bore generations of ignorant murderous, tyrannical, racist and barbaric psychopaths across the Middle East who have oppressed and destroyed Hebrews for thousands of years.
The Arab Slave Trade:
Throughout the medieval times to the 19th century, Arab nations have taken Hebrews and Hammites as slaves; subjecting them to vicious and barbaric captivity. The number is often debated by historians but it is estimated that 10 to 20 million Africans were enslaved during the Arab slave trade. While Arabs enslaved their own people as well as Europeans from the Caucasus region and Caspian Sea, the violence and cruelty was most prevalent towards blacks.
In war, men are the main targets because they pose as threats to the power of the oppressors through rebellions and uprisings. Those in power typically put in their most effort towards destabilizing the man first. The Arabs did this extensively through barbaric means. One of many ways the destablization of the young man was executed was through castration.
Young boys from the ages of eight to twelve were taken by Arab slave owners and put through castration. Their scrotums and even penises would often be removed. Out of every ten, six boys would die due to excessive blood loss from the procedure. This procedure was done not only for the men to not be able to reproduce but it was also done for depopulation as well.
With massive droves of men being left unable to reproduce or dead, the generations that would follow was left with instability. Arab slave owners would target the women to use them as concubines in their harems. For every one man, two women were enslaved. The women were often raped, coerced into having sex, and forced to raise the children of the Arab slave owners. Buying women as sex slaves was deemed as lawful in Islamic law. According to the Islamic law, Muslim slave owners were permitted to having sex with their slaves. It is also allowed in Islam for Muslim slave owners to have sex with a slave outside of marriage.
Surah 23, Al-Muminun, of the Qur’an, verse 1 and verses 5 to 6, states,
1- Certainly will the believers have succeeded: …
5- And they who guard their private parts
6- Except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed, they will not be blamed –
Surah 17, Al-Maarij, verses 28 to 30, states,
28- Indeed, the punishment of their Lord is not that from which one is safe –
29- And those who guard their private parts
30- Except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed, they are not to be blamed –
Both excerpts draw a distinction between wives and those their right hands possess, when clarifying that sexual intercourse with wives or slaves was permissible. Ma malakat aymanukum, meaning, (“what your right hands possess”), is the Quranic term for maids, slaves or captives of war. Considering what verse 28 states in Surah 17, Al-Maarij, it is permissible and endorsed by the Islamic law to have sex with slaves who are seen as possessions or property.
Since slaves are regarded with inferiority in Islam, they could never speak out about the sexual abuse they endured. Not only would they be subjected to having sex with slave owners, they were also vulnerable to other family members in the owner’s household, guests, and neighbors. In a situation in which a race of people are deemed mere possessions in a land where you have complete rulership, men will rape without regard or worry about facing punishment for their actions.
Directly mirroring the conditions of American slavery, Hebrew women were forced to give birth to and raise the children of their Arab slave owners. This was done of course to keep the cycle running of more slaves. Many children born to Hebrew women died at birth. While the women were mainly kept as concubines for sex, there were others who were kept as house maids to serve within the households.
Considering the massive deaths among young black men through castration and Arab slave owners having more children with black female sex slaves, the amount of descendants of slaves from the Arab slave trade in the Middle East today are scarce. In comparison to about tens of millions of the descendants of slaves from the Trans Atlantic slave trade living in America, there are only about 1 million descendants of the Arab slave trade living in the Middle East.
In the early days of Islam, a plentiful supply of new slaves were brought due to rapid conquest and expansion. It was a core tenent in Islam that only prisoners of war were to be enslaved. However, as the frontiers grew more stable, the supply of slaves decreased greatly. The prisoners of later wars between Muslims and Christians were commonly ransomed or exchanged.
This decrease in the supply of slaves led to Arabs who wanted slaves looking elsewhere to avoid the restrictions of the Quran. This created an increase of importing slaves from non-Muslim lands; targeting Hebrews and Africans. Islamic legislations against the abuse of the slaves limited the extent of enslavement in Arabian Peninsula and to a lesser degree for the whole area of the whole Umayyad Caliphate where slavery had existed since ancient times. With the passage of time and the extension of Islam, Islam by recognizing and codifying slavery seems to have done more to protect and expand slavery than the reverse.
In Islam, free-born Muslims could not be enslaved, and the only way that a non-Muslim could be enslaved was being captured in the course of holy war. In early Islam, Muslims, Christians and Jews could not be enslaved.
Slavery was also perceived as a way of converting non-Muslims to Islam. A task of the masters was religious instruction. Conversion and assimilation into the society of the master didn’t automatically lead to emancipation, though there was normally some guarantee of better treatment and was deemed a prerequisite for emancipation. The majority of Sunni authorities approved the manumission of all the “People of the Book”. According to some jurists -especially among the Shi’a- only Muslim slaves should be liberated. Propagators of Islam in Africa often revealed a cautious attitude towards proselytizing Africans because it led to the decrease in the potential reservoir of slaves. In addition, converting them to Islam would grant them more rights. Since Islam prohibited freeborn Muslims from being enslaved, it was not in the interest for Arab slave owners to convert enslaved Africans to Islam. Still, if an African converted to Islam, he was not guaranteed freedom nor did it confer freedom to their children. Many Hebrews were forced to adhere to Islam to be able to survive in those conditions. Radical Muslims would kill any person who expressed faith other than Islam.
Islam: The world’s second largest religion in the world, Islam, has captured all races of the world; stemming from Caucasians to Africans to Negroes to Hispanics to Asians and more. Let’s keep in mind that the basic understanding that The Most High is only dealing with a handful of people to be given office with Him shows that no religion which has billions of people following it can be the right path. Like Christianity and Judaism, Islam is a branch of the Babylonian Mystery School System. The name Allah seemingly stems from Al-Lat, a pre-Islamic Arabian goddess who was worshipped along with Manat and al-‘Uzza at the Mecca- which is the main region where Muslims go to perform the hajj. Al-Uzza along with Manat and Al-Lat were of the Triple Goddess altar which were worshipped as the daughters of Hubal by pre-Islamic Arabs at Mecca.
Al-Lat is the Arabian version of Athena, the Greek goddess of war and the Roman equivalent Minerva. She was even referred to as “Athena-Allāt”. The moon is perhaps the most profound symbol of the Mother Goddess.
Al-Lat can also be identified with the Babylonian goddess Ishtar; both deities taking part in prosperity and warfare. Allat the Triple Moon Goddess like the rest of the more prominent goddess in mythology are altars of Semiramis, the Queen of Babylon and the wife and mother of Nimrod. The moon is known to symbolize femininity.
As seen above the eight-point star is commonly used in Islamic art. The eight-point star was the symbol of Ishtar- known as the “Star of Ishtar”. The star is not only a symbol of witchcraft but it is a symbol of illumination; referring to the knowledge of the left-hand path in which only the students of the Babylonian Mystery School system have had the supposed privilege of knowing.
Another symbol associated with Al-Lat is the lion. The Lion of Al-Lat that once adorned her temple depicts a lion and a gazelle. The lion was her consort. The gazelle represented al-Lat’s tender and loving traits, as bloodshed was not permitted under penalty of al-Lat’s retaliation. The lion is also a major symbol of Ishtar as well- named the “Lion of Babylon”. It is quite clear that Al-Lat is another aspect of the Babylonian Mystery System; sharing several traits with other goddesses.
Considering this, it begs the question as to why the symbol of Islam is the crescent moon if Muhammad tore down the statues of Al-Lat as stated in the Quran.
The Great Mosque of Mecca, known as the Masjid al-Haram is home to the Ka’bah, is Islam’s holiest site and the direction of prayer for all Muslims (qibla). The Ka’bah or Kaaba is the building in the center of Mecca which is donned in black and gold.
The Cube of Saturn is one of Saturn’s most profound symbols. The Cube is in reference to the hexagonal shape of the Eternal Vortex on the North Pole of the planet Saturn. The god Saturn is known in occult circles as the Black Sun or the Ice Planet. Red witches or bad witches are adherents to the principles of Saturn; meaning that they make no qualms about the rituals in which they perform and embrace the dark energies openly. They also wear all-black clothing to signify their allegiance to Saturn. In alchemy, Saturn is the closest planet to the Sun. The sun, like the star, is a symbol of illumination of the secret mystery knowledge of the Babylonian system.
The Ka’aba clearly has a striking resemblance to the Cube of Saturn. Considering how Muslims circle around the Ka’aba endlessly in Mecca and pray in it’s direction, it seems that Muslims are giving honor to an idol. It is strange that a religion which tore down monuments and idols would decree in it’s law that you had to pray in the direction or give honor to another monument.
The Black Stone is a stone which is on the corner of the Ka’aba. The Black Stone is adorned and touched by the Muslims surrounding the Ka’aba. It is revered by Muslims as an Islamic relic which, according to Muslim tradition, dates back to the time of Adam and Eve. In pre-Islamic pagan times, the stone was venerated at the Ka’aba. According to Islamic tradition, it was set intact into the Kaaba’s wall by Muhammad in 605 CE, five years before his first revelation. Since then it has been broken into fragments and is now cemented into a silver frame in the side of the Kaaba. Its physical appearance is that of a fragmented dark rock, polished smooth by the hands of pilgrims. Islamic tradition holds that it fell from heaven as a guide for Adam and Eve to build an altar.
Muslim pilgrims circle the Kaaba as a part of the tawaf ritual during the hajj and many try to stop to kiss the Black Stone, emulating the kiss that Islamic tradition records that it received from Muhammad. If you look at the silver frame, it clearly resembles the vagina. This can add onto the case that the pagan imagery behind Islam is derived from the Mother Goddess.
The Present Times: Despite disbelief, slavery of blacks is still present in parts of the world; particularly in Africa. Most people have the common misconception that slavery is something of the past times during the 19th and early 20th century. This is certainly not the case. The last countries to abolish slavery was Saudi Arabia and North Yemen in 1962, Trucial States in 1964, South Yemen in 1967, Oman in 1970, and Mauritania in 1981. The last countries to criminalize slavery was Niger in 2003, Mauritania in 2007, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic in 2010, and Chad just three years in 2017. While slavery is outlawed by all countries, it still goes on even now. The most notable countries in which slavery is present at the present times are Mauritania, Libya, Nigeria, Algeria, and Sudan. Africans are still being vehemently abused physically, mentally, and emotionally in these countries as well as the Middle East.
According to the International Labour Organization, as of 2016, around 40.3 million people around the world perform involuntary servitude of some kind.
There are several forms of slavery, such as debt bondage, forced labor, sex slavery, and the most familiar form which is chattel slavery — where a person is the wholly-owned property of another.
In chattel slavery, the slave cannot pay a debt and be freed. In contrast to sex slavery, a chattel slave, even after their most “useful” years, is typically not set free. A chattel slave can be beaten, bought, sold, given, inherited, raped, and rented. Any children resulting from rape by the master are his also his property. Chattel slavery still is ongoing; particularly in Africa.
The only black chattel slaves in the world are owned by Arabs and Muslims. This has been scarcely covered by the mainstream media within recent years and is often swept under the rug.
Today, an estimate of between 529,000 to 869,000 black men, women, and children are still bought, owned, sold, and traded by Arab and black Muslim masters in five African countries – Mauritania, Libya, Nigeria, Algeria, and Sudan.
In Algeria, Sub-Saharan Africans fleeing violence and poverty for the sake of survival in Europe are enslaved by Algerian Arabs as they try to cross the Mediterranean. According to the Global Slavery Index, around 106,000 Africans are estimated to be enslaved.
Migrant women and children risk being forced into sex slavery while men perform unskilled labor. Unlike typical debt bondage, traffickers are not obliged to release the enslaved once their debt is somehow paid. Those who avoid slavery are also subjected to virulent Arab racism, further marginalizing the Africans who live there.
As in Algeria, Africans hoping for a better life in Europe travel to Libya but end up being trafficked across the Mediterranean; often times to Italy. Once there, some are enslaved by local Arabs and other traffickers. According to the U.N., there are between 700,000 and 1 million black African migrants currently in Libya. The Global Slavery Index estimates that 48,000 of them live as slaves. Survivors of slavery in Libya have reported torture and sexual abuse. Some survivors were even forced to become prostitutes shortly after they reached Libya.
The slave trade in Libya became international news when CNN obtained video of an actual slave auction in 2017.
Here is the video by CNN showing viral footage of black men being sold in Libya.
In Mauritania, the very structure of society has been based on slavery. For hundreds of years, a cruel class system has been in place in which the lighter-skinned Arabs and Arabized Berbers rule over the black former slaves who have been forcibly Arabized over time. The free blacks in the south who refuse Arabization; calling themselves “Negro-Africans,” and the black chattel slave class (abid) are placed at the bottom. Though the country is entirely Muslim, and the fact that Islam theoretically forbids the enslavement of one Muslim by another, the severity of Arab racism even goes beyond the adherence the Sharia law.
In 1993, a U.S. State Department report estimated that between 30,000 and 90,000 blacks lived as slaves owned by private masters. In 2011, a CNN investigation estimated that the number could be as high as between 340,000 and 680,000. According to the official Global Slavery Index, 90,000 people are estimated to be living as modern slaves in Mauritania.
There are no slave markets which exist in Mauritania. All slaves are born in masters’ households from the master raping African women, or ordering couples of slaves to breed in order to create more slaves. In the absence of open markets, slaves change hands quietly in individual sales. They are traded as substitutes for money in the settling of gambling debts and other types of debts. They can even be rented.
It was only until 2007 when slavery was criminalized in Mauritania. However, it has still been ongoing until now and will never be truly eradicated because slavery is so engrained into society in Mauritania.
Here is footage from an 1996 investigation into Mauritanian slavery.
Among the most disturbing aspects of the long-running civil war in Nigeria has been slavery. Conflicts between the Muslim majority and the Christian minority have led to the growth of terrorist violence in which taking Christian slaves has become a source of compensation for Islamic fighters.
Jihad organizations like ISIS affiliate Boko Haram has been the main source of contemporary slave raids. The most infamous incident of a slave raid was Boko Haram’s abduction of 276 Christian schoolgirls in the town of Chibok on April 14, 2014. Alot of slaves in Nigeria are young girls who are kidnapped and kept as the concubines of the Islamic soldiers. Some of the slaves are driven to such a point that they become suicide bombers to escape the life of a sex slave.
Though the U.S. State Department’s 2018 human rights report on Nigeria mentions that the number of slaves captured and owned by Boko Haram terrorists today could be in the thousands. They stated then that the full number is “unknown.”
Boko Haram is also known to abduct and recruit young boys for the purpose of being used as child soldiers and suicide bombers.
Some Nigerians, among many other populations, seeking economic opportunity in Europe who look to flee the country are often intercepted and enslaved by African or Arab traffickers in Libya while waiting to cross the Mediterranean Sea.
The selling of Africans in Nigeria by Arabs is also still present. Just this year, in April, a Nigerian woman was put up for sale by an Arab man on Facebook. The man put her up for sale for $1,000 (£807) on Facebook. Thankfully, the woman was rescued by authorities in Lebanon and the man was arrested. For this to have even occured shows you that slavery is still a major problem and ongoing.
According to an article n October 2014 by The Guardian, women shared their experiences as being captives forced into slavery by Boko Haram in Nigeria.
The article stated, “Testimonies from girls who escaped their captors — along with others abducted in separate incidents who fled or were released — and gathered by Human Rights Watch have built a picture of violence and terror inside Boko Haram’s camps.…
The women and girls were held in eight different camps for periods ranging from two days to three months, after being taken from their homes, while working on farms, fetching water or at school. The report said that abducted women and girls held by Boko Haram ranged in age from infancy to 65.
“They and many others they saw in the camps were subjected to physical and psychological abuse; forced labour; forced participation in military operations, including carrying ammunition or luring men into ambush; forced marriage to the captors; and sexual abuse, including rape,” [Human Rights Watch’s] report says. “In addition, they were made to cook, clean and perform other household chores. Others served as porters, carrying the loot stolen by the insurgents from villages and towns they had attacked.”
A 15-year-old girl who was held in a Boko Haram camp for four weeks in 2013 described being forced to marry a militant more than twice her age. “After we were declared married I was ordered to live in his cave but I always managed to avoid him. He soon began to threaten me with a knife to have sex with him, and when I still refused he brought out his gun, warning that he would kill me if I shouted. Then he began to rape me every night. He was a huge man in his mid-30s and I had never had sex before. It was very painful and I cried bitterly because I was bleeding afterwards.”
A social worker who has dealt with victims of Boko Haram violence told HRW that the rape of abducted women had been underreported because of the stigma and shame attached to sexual abuse in northern Nigeria.
A 19-year-old who was raped said: “I could not tell anyone what happened, not even my husband. I still feel so ashamed and cheated.” Another woman with her, who was also raped, “vowed never to speak of it again as she was single and believes that news of her rape would foreclose her chances of marriage.”
Even if some of these actions are not being carried out or committed by Arab men, they are also responsible for these actions occurring in the first place due to the Arabization of Nigerians and the brainwashing tactics which has been used to raise boys into becoming brutish soldiers for the sake of Islam.
In Sudan, slavery remains from the Second Sudanese Civil War which took place from 1983 to 2005. During this time period, the Arab Muslim government in the north of the country declared a holy war upon the Christian south of the country, resulting in the estimated deaths of 2.5 million and enslavement as many as 200,000 people. The war was waged in attempt to force the rest of Sudan in the South ino Arabization and submission to Islam.
While the war ended in 2005 and South Sudan became the world’s newest nation on July 9, 2011, many Sudanese slaves remain as the property of Arab masters across the new border in the north. As of 2006, James Aguer Alic, a former Sudanese government minister, estimated that it could be as high as 35,000. According to the Global Slavery Index, it is estimated that 465,000 people are living in modern slavery in Sudan.
The slaves lucky enough to be liberated in mass buy-backs, of whom were mostly women have told stories of abduction, beatings, forced conversion to Islam, harsh labor, Islamic vaginal mutilation, malnutrition, and rape.
One woman, Amel Dor Manyuol, who was freed as the only survivor of six children in 2014, shared her experiences stating, “The slave raiders came at night, on horses. I watched them shoot some of my brothers and sisters, and I saw the rest flee into the bush. I assume they’re dead. We were four brothers and three sisters: Adup, Akot, Achier, Abuk, Adut, Akuol and me. I haven’t seen any of them since.…
Mohammed had one wife and two older sons. They were all unkind to me. You can see on my left arm I have a scar from a bite, and a burn-scar. These were given to me by the baby girl I had to take care of, after she grew up. On my left leg is a knife scar, from Mohammed’s children. When Mohammed saw these wounds, he said, “She’s a jengai [a racial epithet.] It’s no problem.”
Mohammed’s sons raped me. So did Mohammed.
Mohammed had me circumcised. An old man named Abdullah did it. They told me, “If you join us, you have to be like us.” At first I refused, but I was terribly beaten until I agreed. Before that, they gave me a new name: Hawa.”
Here is a video of a black Sudanese former slave tell the story of how he was kidnapped during a brutal slave raid, enslaved for 10 years, and then escaped from his Arab master.
The stories are endless. The point remains that Islam and Arabization has been the main cause of much of the turmoil, violence, death, rape, and suffering in Sudan and across Africa.
The Fall in Kuwait:
Just to expound further on the treatment of Africans by Arabs, here is a story which made headlines in spring 2017.
In Kuwait, a terrified Ethiopian maid pleaded for help as she held onto the window from a seven-story building in her employer’s room. Her Arab female employer filmed as she lost her grip and fell down from the seven-story building. Here is the footage.
The Ethiopian worker survived the fall with just a broken arm. She claims that she was fleeing a lady who was trying to kill her inside the apartment in Kuwait.
“The lady put me in the bathroom and was about to kill me in the bathroom without anybody finding out, she would have thrown my body out like rubbish, so instead of staying there, I went to save myself and then I fell,” she said.
The maid gripping the balcony crying stated, “Hold me, hold me.” In response, her Kuwaiti boss just replied, “Crazy, come,” before the woman’s hand slipped and fell from the window.
Police arrested the employer for not helping the woman and posting the clip on social media. The boss claimed she filmed the ordeal in case she was accused of killing the maid.
Kuwait is home to about 600,000 foreign domestic workers who are mostly from Asia and Africa. Accusations of abuse at the hands of employers are common in Kuwait as well.
It shows you that the times have never truly changed and these things are still ongoing- it is just covered up well.
“Abeed”: Abeed (Arabic: عبد, plural Abīd عبيد or al-Abīd العبيد), is a term in Arabic which means “slaves”. The word, abeed, has been stated to be an allusion to the spiritual submission that Muslims owe to Allah. It is a common phrase within Islam to state that a Muslim is a slave to Allah. The name, ‘Abdullah’ literally means “slave to Allah”. A similar word to Abeed and root of the name ‘Abdullah’ is Abd (Arabic: عبد) which means one who is subordinated as a slave or a servant; it means also to worship.
The term is widely used in the Middle East and North Africa by Arabs in reference to all black people; whether it be Hebrews or Hammites. This is derived from the Arab Slave Trade which heightened much of the societal racism and bigotry towards black people in the Arab world. It is used as a derogatory term to denote black people. The Arabic term for addressing black people is ‘aswad’ which literally translates to dark skinned, and black. In addition, the term ‘adam’ in Arabic means very dark skinned. Ali ibn al-Athir, an Arab historian of the 12th century, concerning the term “adam” stated, “When used to describe the complexion of a human, it means very dark-skinned…It is said that the term comes from the expression the ‘face’ or ‘surface of the earth’ which means the color of the earth. From this term Adam, the father of mankind, received his name”. Al-Tha’aalabi, who was a Persian writer in the 11th century, discussed the Arabic terms for different degrees of skin tones in his book, Fiqh Al-Lugha. In Chapter 13 – The Degrees of Blackness in Humans, Al-Tha’aalabi states, “If there is a slight blackness in his/her complexion, he/she is asmar. If his/her blackness is more intense with some yellow showing, he/she is asham (with Arabic letter saad) أصحم . If his/her blackness is more intense than asmar, he/she is adam آدم. If his/her blackness is more intense than that (adam آدم), he/she is asham (with Arabic letter seen) أسحم . If he/she is is extremely black, he/she adlam أدلم.
Considering there are several terms for all degrees of skin tones within the Arabic language, it is clear that there would be no other reason to call a black male or female “abeed” other than to insult or degrade them. It is common even nowadays for Arabs, especially of older generations, to call all black people “abeed” when referring to them during conversation; whether they are Hebrews or Hammites. It is a term which groups all black people into a category with the intention of denoting them as sub-humans of a low mindset and status. To call black people “abeed” is to say that they are only worthy of being referred to as slaves and not actual human beings.
In Afghanistan, there is a criminal phenomenon which has been present for years on end. This is known as “Bacha Bazi”. Breaking down the words in Arabic, the root word of بچه or bacheh means “boy”, and the root word of بازی or bazi means “play, game”. This practice involves a range of activities which centers around adult men having sex with young adolescent men or prepubescent boys through sex slavery and child prostitution. This practice is carried out by high ranking police officials and warlords to coerce and force young boys to service them sexually.
The boys are referred to as “the dancing boys”. The bachehs or dancing boys are young boys specially trained to perform a particular set of dances. The men who would be serviced will often sit in a circle while the boy, dressed up in a dress and sometimes with makeup on, would dance and entertain the men. The boys will dance in a very effeminate manner; similar to the mannerisms of a female belly dancer. They are barefoot and dressed up as women in long, brightly coloured silk smocks reaching below their knees and narrow trousers fastened tightly round their ankles. Their arms and hands sparkle with rings and bracelets. They wear their hair long, reaching below the shoulders, though the front part of the head is clean shaven. The nails of the hands and feet are painted red and their eyebrows are jet black. The dances are sensual with contortions of the body meant to invoke sexual energy.
While they are dancing, the men often will throw money at the boys while they are dancing which is similar to how men throw money at erotic dancers at strip clubs. Quite often, after the boy has completed his dance for the amusement of the men, the men will have sex with the boys. With the seductive dancing in which the boy performs, he is unwillingly conjuring sexual energy and arousal within the men which would prompt the men to have sex with the boy thereafter. Sometimes, the men can be so aroused that they get close to the boys while they are dancing and attempt to sexually touch them. This can prompt other men to pull them back so the boy can continue to dance uninterrupted.
After the dance is complete, their services are auctioned off to the highest bidder. The boy will sometimes be purchased outright. The boys will be forced to endure anal sex with their buyer.
Here is footage of Bacha Bazi taking place.
When correlating this practice with the name “Bacha”, there is a pagan meaning behind it all. Bacha is a form or variation of the name of the Greek god, Bacchus.
Bacchus is the Greek god of wine, revelry, vegetation, insanity, ritual madness, religious ecstasy, androgyny, festivity, and the theater. The Roman name for Bacchus is Dionysus but they are the same entity. Most importantly, the rites of Bacchus is tied to pederasty, homosexuality and orgies. On a side note, since Bacchus is the god of theater, this is the reason why the film industry adheres to the Bacchanalian practices of excess in drinking, ecstasy, orgies, and revelry.
Furthermore, while Bacchus is not distinctly labeled as a god of pederasty as Pan is, those who worship Bacchus often conflate pederasty and pedophilia with their practices as well. It is common during orgiastic rituals for Bacchus, that young boys would be partaking in the orgies with other men. This is known as Bacchanalia which is officialy defined as “a Roman festival of Bacchus celebrated with dancing, song, and revelry”. During the Bacchanalia, following the dancing and singing, orgies would ensue after a wild frenzy induced by intoxication from wine. While the men during Bacha Bazi do not drink alcohol, they are certaintly intoxicated by their perverse lust for the young boys.
Under the Taliban, bacha bazi was declared homosexual in nature, and therefore banned. The Taliban’s opposition to bacha bazi was that they considered it incompatible with Sharia law, and outlawed the practice after coming to power in 1996. As with other homosexual activities, the charge carried the death penalty. However, it is still ongoing till present day; which much of it is due to intentional negligence and even participation.
(Participation by DynCorp)
In December 2010, it was revealed by WikiLeaks that foreign contractors from DynCorp had spent money on bacha bazi in northern Afghanistan. In 2009, DynCorp contractors paid a 17-year-old Afghan Bacha Bazi performer to entertain them in Kunduz, Afghanistan. In a leaked May 2009 document, it mentions Afghan Interior Minister Hanif Atmar in a United States diplomatic cable to the State Department expressing concern that “lives could be in danger” if news leaked that foreign police trainers working for DynCorp hired dancing boys to perform for them. Atmar pushed to have any news article or video of the incident silenced. Atmar requested that the U.S. military “assume control” over DynCorp training centres. In response, the U.S. embassy claimed that this was not “legally possible under the DynCorp contract”. To save face, DynCorp fired four senior managers and also established a chief compliance officer position that focused on ethics, business conduct, related investigations, and regulatory compliance.
Eleven Afghans were later arrested and investigated; two Afghan police officers and nine Afghan civilians on charges of “purchasing a service from a child”. The official report stated that the boy was dressed in a t-shirt and jeans while performing a “tribal dance”. No DynCorp employee was prosecuted.
A 2009 email from Hillary Clinton’s archive mentioned DynCorp’s hiring of an “adolescent boy dancer” from Afghanistan “for some sort of event that, at least to most folks, looked very inappropriate.” Here is the direct quote:
“According to my reporting, the week of April 13th, the DynCorp regional commander from Konduz, Flint Chambers, allowed his men to hire a 15-year-old boy dancer to do tribal dances at a DynCorp party on the training site. Some 15 or so DynCorp employees in attendance pulled out a single chair and had the boy do mock lap dances. This was captured on video. The video shows DynCorp employees putting dollar bills in the boy’s waistband, just as they would a stripper’s garter. The revelry lasted about 45 minutes.”
This message was sent directly to Hillary Clinton from Cheryl Mills who is one of her most prominent lawyers who testified before the House Select Committe on Benghazi and defended Bill Clinton from impeachment. By reading the email, it appears the email written to Hillary Clinton and her team about an impending article on the DynCorp Afghanistan scandal was to spark the action needed to cover up parts of the article.
In 2015, The New York Times reported that U.S. soldiers serving in Afghanistan were instructed by their commanders to ignore child sex abuse carried out by Afghan security forces and only act upon it “when rape is being used as a weapon of war”. American soldiers have been instructed not to intervene. In some cases, American soldiers are instructed not to intervene even when Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases.
By neglecting and even perpetuating further sexual exploitation and abuse of young Arab boys through the bacha bazi practice, the hopes of it being quelled in the Arab world has been voided by America’s blatant complicity. Instead of addressing the evil, America has decided to partake in it several times over.
Child Brides in the Middle East and Muslim Countries: Another practice centered around pederasty in the Middle East is little girls being married as brides to grown men. In spite of the age of consent laws in the Middle East, it is often ignored. Girls are often forced to marry by their parents as the biggest priority for them is to be married. The parents are putting this priority before their consideration of the girl’s physical and mental well-being, education, and chance to build her own future. In extreme cases, girls are often married from the ages of six to fourteen.
Most child brides are illiterate and do not finish primary school. They are forced to drop out by their families due to marriage or betrothal of marriage. While we all have our opinions on the ineffectiveness of the school system, teenagers in modern society are not mentally nor emotionally built at their age to think about marriage or to take upon themselves the responsibilities of being mothers. To put a girl into a situation where she has to transition from thinking about school and making friends to adulthood by marrying far older men can be harrowing for them mentally and emotionally.
In particular, Saudi Arabia has been a region in which the widespread prevalence of child marriage has been documented. Saudi clerics have justified the marriage of girls as young as 9 years old. For the longest time, there were no laws which defined a minimum age of consent in Saudi Arabia. It was only until last year in 2019 where members of the Saudi Shoura Council approved new regulations for minor marriages that would outlaw the marrying of 15-year-olds and force the need for court approval for those under 18. Chairman of the Human Rights Committee at the Shoura Council, Dr. Hadi Al-Yami, said that introduced controls were based on in-depth studies presented to the body. He pointed out that the regulation, vetted by the Islamic Affairs Committee at the Shoura Council, has raised the age of marriage to 18 and prohibited it for those under 15.
Turkey is another country in which child marriage is prevalent. The majority of the population in Turkey is Muslim; 98.6% to be exact. Almost one in three girls in Turkey are married under the age of 18. Nearly 30% of marriages in Turkey involve girls who are under 18 years.
According to a 2018 Turkish report, nearly 500,000 underage girls were married in the last 10 years. Twenty-six percent of the females were married before the age of 18. Ten percent of the females had children before the age of 18. Some 142,298 underage mothers were recorded in the last six years. Since 2002, approximately 440,000 underage girls have given birth in Turkey. Nearly 16,000 women under the age of 15 who have given birth after were exposed to sexual abuse.
Furthermore, between 2012 and 2014, over 90,000 cases were filed in Turkey about The rape, sexual harassment or exploitation of underage girls is also . The leading causes for the deaths of girls aged 15-19 in Turkey are from childbirth and pregnancy complications.
While child marriage is prohibited in Turkey and is punishable by imprisonment for the man who marries an underage girl and for those who arrange and plan the marriage as well, there is a discrepancy in the legal framework regarding child marriage: the minimum age for the marriage of girls is 15 according to the Turkish Penal Code, 17 (for both sexes) according to the Turkish Civil Code and 18 according to the Child Protection Act. Turkish Civil Code also maintained a minimum marriageable age of 15 for girls until a change in 2002. This loophole
In 2016, the governing Islamist conservative Justice and Development Party (AKP) sought to introduce legislation which would have made child rape no longer punishable if the perpetrator would offer to marry his victim. In response, the public outraged at this proposal and saw it as an attempt to legitimize rape and encourage child marriage. Due to the outrage, the proposal was withdrawn.
Child marriage has been found to be prevalent among Syrian and Palestinian refugees in Lebanon. Marriage was seen as a potential way to protect family honor and protect a girl from rape given how common rape was during the conflict. Incidents of child marriages increased in Syria and among Syrian refugees over the course of the conflict. The proportion of Syrian refugee girls living in Jordan who were married increased from 13% in 2011 to 32% in 2014.
(Child Brides in Afghanistan)
In Afghanistan, child marriage is even more prominent. In 2013, report claims 53% of all married women in Afghanistan were married before age 18, and 21% of all were married before age 15. Afghanistan’s official minimum age of marriage for girls is 15 with her father’s permission.
A major reason why child marriage is so prominent in Afghanistan is due to the adherence to the practice called ba’ad. This custom is practiced in all 34 provinces of Afghanistan. This custom involves village elders, jirga, settling disputes between families, unpaid debts or ruling punishment for a crime by forcing the family guilty of the crime to give their 5- to 12-year-old girls as a wife as payment for the crime. Sometimes a girl is forced into child marriage for a crime her uncle or distant relative is alleged to have committed. Andrew Bushell claims rate of marriage of 8- to 13-year-old girls exceeding 50% in Afghan refugee camps along the Pakistan border.
Over half of Yemeni girls are married before the age of 18. Some Yemeni girls are even married by the age of eight years old. Yemeni government’s Sharia Legislative Committee has blocked attempts to raise marriage age to either 15 or 18, on grounds that any law setting minimum age for girls is un-Islamic. There are some Yemeni Muslim activists who even argue that some girls are ready for marriage at the age of 9. According to HRW, in 1999 the minimum marriage age which was set at 15 for women was abolished. The onset of puberty was interpreted by conservatives to be at age nine and was set as a requirement for consummation of marriage. In practice, “Yemeni law allows girls of any age to wed, but it forbids sex with them until the indefinite time they’re ‘suitable for sexual intercourse’.”
In April 2008, Nujood Ali, a 10-year-old girl, successfully obtained a divorce after being raped under the conditions of child marriage. Her case prompted calls to raise the legal age for marriage to 18. Later in the year, the Supreme Council for Motherhood and Childhood proposed to define the minimum age for marriage at 18 years. The law was passed in April 2009, with the age voted for as 17. However, the law was dropped the next day following opposition by parliamentarians. Negotiations to pass the legislation have continued ever since.
Another major story broke out in Yemen years ago when an 8 years-old named Rawan from Kuwait died from internal injuries soon after her wedding night. She suffered profuse vaginal bleeding from her genitals being torn by her 40 year old husband after penetration on her wedding night. It sparked outrage from Yemens in the country and across social media.
The widespread prevalence of child marriage in Saudi Arabia has been documented by human rights groups. Similar to Yemeni activists, Saudi clerics have justified the marriage of girls as young as 9 years old with sanction from the judiciary. In 2019, members of the Saudi Shoura Council approved new regulations for minor marriages that will outlaw 15-year-olds from marriage and push forth the need for court approval for girls of whom are under 18. Dr. Hadi Al-Yami, Chairman of the Human Rights Committee at the Shoura Council, said that introduced controls were based on in-depth studies presented to the body. Al-Yami pointed out that the regulation which was vetted by the Islamic Affairs Committee at the Shoura Council, has raised the age of marriage to 18 and prohibited it for those under 15. Saudi Arabia has officially updated the law banning all marriages under the age of 18.
Iran is another major Arab nation in which child marriage is prevalent. It is a legislative, cultural and economic struggle which drives children to be married off. In Iran, the Sharia based laws dictate that the legal age for boys to marry is 15 years of age while for girls the age is set at 13 years. This ruling is however not absolute as girls and boys can be married off at even younger ages by the consent of their fathers and permission from court judges. Therefore, there truly is not a definitive minimum age in which a person can be married. One of the main reasons why girls can be married off at an age below 13 is due to the phenomenon of blood marriages; a resolve for the conflicts between tribes by a tribeman offering their daughter as a wager to a man of the other tribe. This is similar to the aforementioned practice- ba’ad in Afghanistan. This practice is still carried out in tribal areas where it’s inhabitants remain adherent to ancient laws and practices. The poverty of a family may also lead them to marrying off their daughters in exchange for money or house in a transaction. This was practiced in the ancient times where girls were seen as commodities to bargaining agreements for the sake of ending wars. Women were seen as possessions who can be bought or traded. This has never truly went away as many parts of the world have remained diligent in upholding and maintaining these constructs and systems. Not to digress, while women have had freedom, liberty, the power to earn income and even create and own their own business within Western society, girls in tribal areas within Arab and African nations are still looked at as commodities and don’t even have a fraction of the rights in which women have in Western society. That’s neither here nor there.
To further expound upon the pervasiveness of child marriage in Iran, about 17% of girls in Iran are married before the age of 18 and 3% of girls are married before the age of 15. Thousands of children get married unofficially without registration and often leads to many cases in which a girl’s actual age is not correctly recorded.
Iran ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1994, which sets a minimum age of marriage of 18, but made reservation to articles and provisions which may be contrary to the Islamic Sharia law. Iran is one of few countries that has not signed or ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
During its 2014 Universal Periodic Review, Iran agreed to examine recommendations to abolish laws encouraging the marriage of girls as young as nine, and to amend the Civil Code to bring the minimum age for marriage to 18 years old.
Under the Civil Code 2007, marriage “before the age of majority” is prohibited. However the age of majority is 9 lunar years (8 years and 9 months) for girls and 15 lunar years for boys.
Members of the Cultural Commission of Iran have advocated for religious scholars to amend article 1041 of the Civil Code on Marriage Age so that legal authorities can have greater power over deciding whether child marriages can go ahead.
Looking at this, it is clear there is a pervasive and immense issue of pedophilia in the Middle East. It is much to do with the poverty and lack of rationality within these countries. It is also to do with those who inherently believe that it is fine to marry or have intimate relations with a child; whether they be a boy or a girl. It is an issue which will never be truly eradicated within the Middle East because it is so engraphted into the traditions of low level minded citizens, soldiers and officers behind closed doors.
An unspoken depravity which has been prevalent in the deep underbelly of the Arab world is the act of mating with animals. The soldiers or other depraved folk will have sex with mostly goats or donkeys. However, they also will have sex with other animals such as camels and sheep. This is a practice which is not acknowledged openly but it still occurs. This has to do with both the enabling of the behavior and negligence towards it.
When evaluating the enabling of bestiality, there are two sides of it’s enabling: societal and religious.
The leader of the Iranian Revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini wrote several books which addressed sexual proclivites regarding both children and animals. Specifically, in his book, “The Little Green Book”, Khomeini stipulated the regulations regarding the sodomy of animals. On page 24, Khomeini states, “If one commits an act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrements become impure, and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed as guickly as possible and burned, and the price of it paid to its owner by him who sodomized it.”
In this statement, there is no legal punishment which is outlined regarding the person who commits sodomy with an animal. The only thing in which that man is required to do in that situation is for him to pay the animal’s owner the price of the animal.
On page 39, in “The Little Green Book”, Khomeini states, “If a man – Allah protect him from it! – fornicates with an animal and ejaculates, ablution is necessary.”
Ablution is the act of washing, cleansing or purification of the body by water. Once again, there is no punishment written to be placed upon the man when he has sex with an animal. All that is required of the man to do is to clean himself afterwards. When there is no outright punishment for bestiality, it will follow up with many who will partake in the act freely without any regard. The phrase, “Allah protect him from it!” is of course to note disapproval of such an act that should be avoided. This statement just notes disapproval and not lethal punishment as many would think.
The Quran does not appear to address bestiality directly in any matter; whether it is to be outlawed or not. There are however hadiths which do address it; albeit they are both contradictory. It is one thing for Islamic scholars to denounce the act but punishment regarding bestiality stated within the Quran itself is another which is needed in order to clarify that Islam does not allow bestiality; whether directly or indirectly.
There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
Sunan Abu Dawud 38:4449:
“The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.”
The very next verse states:
Sunan Abu Dawud 38:4450:
There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
So which one is it? Is it prohibited or is it not? This contradiction can easily be used by advocates of bestiality to disregard Sunan Abu Dawud 38:4449 due to the fact that bestiality was not specifically prohibited in Sunan Abu Dawud 38:4450.
While transgressions such as homosexuality and adultery warrants death as punishment in Afghanistan, bestiality is not nearly punished as severely as the other aforementioned crimes.
According to a March 2004 article from The Age, an Afghani soldier was detained after being caught having sex with a donkey in southeastern Afghanistan. He was discovered during the act with the donkey in an abandoned house in a small village of Gardez, which is the capital of Paktia province.
A Gardez police officer stated that the soldier was caught in the act by a small boy who immediately told police which prompted the police’s arrival and subsequent arrest. The soldier claimed he committed this act with the donkey because he did not have enough money to get married. After his arrest, he was jailed for only four days and then released without charge.
Considering how little punishment the soldier faced for committing bestiality, it begs the question as to why exactly he was practically ‘slapped on the wrist’ by Afghan police in Gardez. Could it be perhaps due to the fact that it is not specified within Afghanistan law whether bestiality is legal or illegal? Could it also be that it is not specified within Afghanistan law whether ownership of zoophilic pornography is legal or illegal?
In 1923, the Director of Health in the British Mandate government in Palestine sent out a questionnaire to his Principal Medical and Health Officers in the country, asking them to report on various sexual practices and attitudes among the Muslim Arab population.
As a result, the British discovered that Muslim Arabs were engaging in bestiality.
The Nablus officer finds sodomy and “similar vices” “not uncommon in some of the towns but less so in the villages where…bestiality is by no mean unknown” and “immorality…rather lightly regarded” in those villages that are closer to the larger towns. He comments, “in the villages there seems to be curiously little feeling against bestiality which I have heard admitted in a very airy way on more than one occasion. Sodomy is considered disgraceful but not I think more so than ordinary immorality”
In Southern Pakistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (North West Frontier Province), Sindh and Balochistan, sex with animals is a common practice among rural youths and is considered a rite of passage into adulthood.
According to the Daily Times from a June 2006 article titled “Desegregation of the sexes and promiscuity”, in southern Pakistan, much of NWFP, Sindh and Balochistan, sodomy and bestiality are common among rural youths. The article details that two boys were caught trying to rape a goat in the vicinity of the mazar of Hazrat Sultan Bahu. The punishment in which the boys were given was 10 blows with a chhittar (shoe) each on their buttocks. The boys protested against the punishment; saying that having sex with an animal was considered in many rural areas a rite of passage to becoming full members of the male society.
In June 2011, a male who was caught having sex with another man’s donkey was fined 50,000 Rs (rupees). The fine was not imposed for having sex with an animal, but for committing adultery. The raped donkey was labelled a ‘kari’ or an adultress and eventually honor killed by its owner and shot dead. The Jirga imposed a fine of 110,000 rupees on the alleged ‘Karo’ or adulterer. The reports said that in Village Ghahi Khan Jatoi, a villager Ghazi Khan killed his donkey on being a ‘Kari’ with Sikandar Ali, the ‘Karo’. Ghazi attempted to kill Sikandar but the alleged Karo managed to escape and surrendered himself to an influential person in the village. Sources said the influential person summoned both the parties and imposed 110,000 rupees fine on Sikandar for adultery. Sikandar and his family were forced to pay Rs 50,000 on the spot and the remaining amount were to be paid in two separate installments. Sikandar pleaded innocence at the Jirga but the Jirga members did not take heed to his plea.
Bestiality is common among boys of tribal Arab cultures.
According to Serving History’s article, “Historical And Cultural Perspectives On Zoophilia”, “Bestiality with goats, sheep, or camels provides another outlet. These practices are not approved but they are recognized as common among boys.” Havelock-Ellis states “The Arabs, according to Kocher, chiefly practice bestiality with goats, sheep and mares. The Annamites, according to Mondiere, commonly employ sows and (more especially the young women) dogs.”
The Arabs have never taken quite so condemnatory an attitude towards the practice, and indeed a popular Arab saying had it that “The pilgrimage to Mecca is not complete without copulating with the camel.”
The following is from a paper on sexuality in Morocco written by Nadia Kadiri, M.D., and Abderrazak Moussaïd, M.D., with Abdelkrim Tirraf, M.D., and Abdallah Jadid, M.D. Translated by Raymond J. Noonan, Ph.D., and Sandra Almeida.
“In the rural world, zoophilia is still very widespread and not blameworthy. With masturbation, it constitute sas an obligatory passage in the adolescent male’s apprenticeship of sexuality. It means in rural Morocco, Muslim males must have sexual intercourse with animals as part of their sexual apprenticeship.”
According to the scholars Allen Edwardes and Robert Masters, Ph.D, FAACS, some of the Muslims of Morocco believe that sexual intercourse with donkeys “makes the penis grow big and strong” and masturbation is often scorned by them in favor of bestiality.
Zoophilic and Child Pornography Interest in Pakistan
Despite being a predominately Muslim country, which generally has a strict hold on their internet and controlling the flow of content in which is deemed as offensive or blasphemous, Pakistan is one of the world’s leaders in online searches for pornographic material. Google ranks Pakistan as one of the leading countries in the world in searches for pornographic terms and sex-related content.
According to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms display that since 2004, Pakistan has been No. 7 in searches per-person for “sex”.
Since 2004, Pakistan ranks No. 1 in searches per-person for “xxx” which is commonly known as a code term for pornographic material. In Pythagorean system, the numerical value of the letter ‘x’ is 6- therefore rendering the numerical value of “xxx” as 666 for the Antichrist or the Mark of the Beast. The porn industry is highly demonic and commonly makes light of having its actresses play the role and take upon themselves the title of a “devil” or “jezebel”. The porn industry has also introduced so-called ‘taboos’ and desensitized viewers to them which include incest, bestiality, rape disguised as “rough sex”, homosexuality, lesbianism, and even the consumption of urine and feces- all practices within the occult and Satanism. The porn industry will be addressed in a later article of it’s own.
Since 2004, Pakistan ranks No. 1 in searches per-person for “child porn”, No. 2 in searches per-person for “child rape”, and No.2 behind Ethiopa in searches per-person for “horse sex” and “donkey sex”.
Between 2004 and 2009, Pakistan was No.1 in searches per-person for “rape pictures”. Since 2004, Pakistan has been No.5 in searches per-person for “rape sex”.
Between 2004 and 2007, Pakistan was No.1 in searches per-person for “child sex”. Since 2004, Pakistan is ranked as No. 2 in searches per-person for “child sex.
Since 2004, Pakistan has been No. 7 in searches per-person for “twink”; a term known in homosexual circles that refers to a youthful homosexual male with boyish qualities- smooth-bodied, only slightly-muscular, with little to no body hair, and has a semi-athletic build.
Between 2004 and 2007, Pakistan was No. 1 in searches per-person for “animal sex”. Since 2004, Pakistan has been No.3 in searches per-person for “animal sex”.
Since 2004, Pakistan has been No.1 in searches per-person for “dog sex”.
Since 2004, Pakistan has been No. 2 in searches per-person for “camel sex”.
Concerning other bestiality related searches per-person since 2004, Google Trends ranks Pakistan as 1st in “bear sex”, 1st in “monkey sex”, 3rd in “goat sex”, 3rd in “cat sex”, 3rd in “cow sex”, 3rd in “elephant sex”, 6th in “fox sex”, 7th in “dog sex”, 9th in “pig sex”, and 11th in “snake sex”.
Pakistan also ranks 3rd in searches per-person for “child sex video” and 4th in “rape video”.
It should also be noted that in all the above mentioned searches, Middle Eastern and Southeast Asian countries disproportiantely rank in the top 25 of ‘interest by region’ along with African countries such as Ethiopia.
Saudi Arabia, Sabbatai Zevi and the House of Saud:
One of the most prosperous and powerful nations in the Arab world, Saudi Arabia is ruled by the House of Saud. While Saudi Arabia for most of time until recently has upheld strict laws, the House of Saud are not what they appear to be.
The House of Saud proclaim themselves as the most diligent and close followers of Islam but this is not true. The House of Saud are Luciferians and are not Muslims. They are not even of true Arab origin. In order to have such an established ruling class family, you must be into the same practices and beliefs as the other major ruling “royal families” in the world such as the British, Belgian, and Dutch royal families who are all Satanists and of elite bloodlines. If the House of Saud was not of an elite bloodline, they would have been targeted and eradicated quite some time ago but they remain one of the most powerful families in the world.
(Wahhabism- Sect of Abdul Wahhab)
A General Military Intelligence Directorate report from September 2002, entitled “The Emergence of Wahhabism and its Historical Roots”, was an Iraqi intelligence document from the time of Saddam Hussein’s reign in power in which was translated by the U.S. Department of Defense. It details the awareness of the Iraqi government pertaining to the nefarious purposes of the Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia in serving Western interests.
The report relies heavily on the Memoirs of Mr. Hempher, which describe in detail that in the middle of the eighteenth century how a British spy in the Middle East made contact with Adbul Wahhab to create a subversive version of Islam in the form of Wahhabism, which became the foundation for the Saudi regime. In it’s initial stages of growth during the middle of the 19th century, Wahhabism was challenged by the Ottoman Turks. However, with the assistance of the British, the Wahhabis returned to power and founded their own state in 1932. Since that point in time, the Saudis have had deep and close relations with America. The U.S. owe much of their wealth to the oil trade with Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia has funded and implemented various Islamic fundamentalist organizations and CIA covert operations such as the jihad in Afghanistan and the 9/11 attacks. The Saudis are never labeled or targeted as terrorists by the mainstream American media because they hold much of the wealth of America by their natural resources despite the fact that most if not all of the 9/11 agents who flew the planes into the Twin Towers were from Saudi Arabia. While Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya have been targeted, Saudi Arabia is never targeted by the media for their practices and the treatment of women in their country in spite of the fact that they have been one of the more overt nations in their violence.
The Saudis use their immense wealth to disseminate Wahhabism to various parts of the world to cause further division capitulated by the elites through social reforms and liberal agendas to dismantle the Islamic Middle East for the Zionists. Saudi Arabia have signed an agreement with Israel that allows the Zionists to use Saudi Arabian airspace as well as Saudi Arabian military airports to launch attacks on Iran. The Nation of Iran is a main target because it remains one of only two nations left in the world that is without a Rothschild central bank who have not succumbed to the globalist agenda. This is the reason why key allies to the central banks such as America and Saudi Arabia unites against the countries that maintain their economic independence who are Iran and North Korea.
The Memoirs of Mr. Hempher has been met with opposition by supporters of Wahhabism; labeling it as fabrication. These include Bernard Haykel, Professor in Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University, who, without providing any evidence, presumes the Memoirs to have been created by Ayyub Sabri Pasha.
However, while the Memoirs only emerged in the 1970s, Pasha wrote his version of the story already in 1888. Ayyub Sabri Pasha was a well-known Ottoman writer and Turkish naval admiral, who served the Ottoman army in the Arabian Peninsula. Pasha wrote several works about the region and its history including “The Beginning and Spreading of Wahhabism”, where he recounts Abdul Wahhab’s association and plotting with Hempher.
In addition, the Iraqi intelligence report also makes claims that both Abdul Wahhab, and his sponsor, ibn Saud, the man who founded the Saudi dynasty, were of Jewish origin.
D. Mustafa Turan wrote in “The Donmeh Jews”, that Abdul Wahhab was a descendant of a family of Donmeh Jews from Turkey. The Donmeh were descendants of followers of the infamous false-messiah of Judaism, Shabbetai Zevi, who in 1666 converted to Islam. Viewing it as a sacred mystery, Zevi’s followers followed him in his ways and subsequently converted to Islam but still practiced their Kabbalistic doctrines in secret. In Europe, the Shabbeteans were eventually led a century later by Jacob Frank, a main who claimed to be the reincarnation of Shabbetai Zevi. According to Rabbi Antelman in To Eliminate the Opiate, to them belonged the Rothschilds. The Donmeh community of Turkey were concentrated in the city of Salonika, which became a hotbed of Masonic activity, and from which the Young Turk movement evolved, which aided in the collapse of the Muslim empire of the Ottoman Turks. There is evidence that Ataturk himself, the founder of the modern Turkish state, was of Donmeh origin as well.
D. Mustafa Turan maintains that Abdul Wahhab’s grandfather, Sulayman was actually Shulman, having belonged to the Jewish community of Bursa in Turkey. From there, he settled in Damascus where he feigned Islam but was expelled for practicing sorcery. He then fled to Egypt where he would once again face condemnation for the same crime. He would then set place in the Hijaz, where he got married and fathered Abdul Wahhab. According to the report, the same is claimed in The Donmeh Jews and the Origin of the Saudi Wahabis, Rifat Salim Kabar.
The notion of the Saudi family being of Jewish heritage has been published by Mohammad Sakher. It is believed by many that Sakher was killed by the Saudi regime for stating his revelations. The report relates a similar account, but from different sources. According to “The Wahabi Movement/The Truth and Roots”, by Abdul Wahhab Ibrahim Al-Shammari, ibn Saud is actually descended from Mordechai bin Ibrahim bin Mushi, a Jewish merchant from Basra. Apparently, when he was approached by members from the Arabian tribe of Aniza, then claimed to be one of them, and traveled with them to Najd and his name became Markhan bin Ibrahim bin Musa.
Additionally, Abdul Wahhab descended from Wahib Al-Tamimi, so, as reported by al Said Nasir, in The History of the Saud Family, the Saudi ambassador in Cairo. In 1943, Abdullah bin Ibrahim al Mufaddal, paid 35,000 Jinee to Muhammad Al-Tamimi , to forge a family tree of the Saudi family and that of Abdul Wahhab, and merge them into one, claiming their origin from Mohammed.
Upon evaluation, this gives perspective in understanding the role that the state of Saudi Arabia has played with regards to supporting and advancing Western power and influence in the Middle East.
In the year 851 A.H. a group of men from Al Masaleekh Clan, which was a branch of the Anza Tribe, formed a caravan for buying cereals (wheat and corn) and other foodstuff from Iraq, and transporting it back to Najd. The head of that group was a man called Sahmi Bin Hathlool. The caravan reached Basra, where the members of the group went to a cereal merchant who was a Jewish man named Mordakhai bin Ibrahim bin Moshe. During their bargaining with that merchant, Mordakhai asked them: “Where are you from?” They answered: “From Anza Tribe; a Clan of Al Masaleekh.” Upon hearing that name, hwstarted to hug so affectionately each on the them saying that he, himself, was also from the clan of Al Masaleekh but he had to reside in Basra (Iraq) due to a family feud between his father and other members of Anza Tribe.
After he recounted to them his fabricated narrative, he ordered his servants to load all of the camels with wheat, dates, and tamman; a remarkable deed so generous that astonished the Masaleekh men and aroused their pride to find such an affectionate (cousin) in Iraq-the source of sustenance; they believed each word he said, and, because he was a rich merchant of the food commodities which they were badly in need, they accepted him (even though he was a Jew concealed under the garb of an Arab from Al Masaleekh clan.)
When the caravan was ready to depart returning to Najd, that Jewish merchant asked them to accept his company, because he intended to go with them to his original homeland, Najd. Upon hearing that from him, they wholeheartedly welcomed him with a very cheerful attitude.
So Mordakhai reached Najd with the caravan. In Najd, he started to promulgate a lot of propaganda for himself through his companions (his alleged cousins), a fact, which gathered around him a considerable number of new supporters. Unexpectedly, he confronted a campaign of opposition to his views led by Sheikh Saleh Salman Abdullah Al Tamimi, who was a Muslim religious preacher in Al-Qaseem. The radius of his preaching area included Najd, Yemen, and Hijaz, a fact which compelled Mordakhai to depart from Al Qaseem to Al Ihsa, where he changed his name (Mordakhai) to Markan bin Dir’iya near Al-Qateef, where he started to spread among the inhabitants a fabricated story about the shield of Muhammad that it was taken as treasure by an Arab pagan in consequence of the Battle of Uhud between the Arab pagans and the Muslims. “That shield,” he said, “was sold by the Arab pagan to a Jewish clan called Banu Qunaiqa who preserved it as a treasure! He gradually enhanced his position among the Bedouins through such stories, which indicated how the Jewish clans in Arabia were so influential. He gained some personal importance among the Bedouins, and decided to permanently settle there, at Dir’iya town, near Al Qateef, which he decided to be his “Capital” on the Persian Gulf. He aspired to make it his springboard for establishing a Jewish Kingdom in Arabia.
In order to fulfill his ambitious scheme, he started to approach the Bedouins for support of his position, and then gradually, he declared himself as their king.
At that juncture, Ajaman Tribe, together with Banu Khaled Tribe became fully aware of that Jewish cunning plan after they had verified his true identity, and decided to put an end to him. They attacked his town and conquered it, but before arresting him he had escaped by the skin of his teeth.
Mordakhai, sought shelter in a farm at that time called Al-Malibeed-Ghusaiba near Al-Arid, which is called at our present time Al-Riyadh.
He requested the owner of that farm to grant him asylum. The farmer was so hospitable that he immediately gave him sanctuary. But no longer than a month had he (Mordakhai) stayed there, when he assassinated the landlord and all members of his family, pretending that they were killed by an invading band of thieves. Then he pretended that he had bought that real estate from them before that catastrophe happened to them. Accordingly, he had the right to reside there as a landlord. He then gave a new name to that place: Al-Diriya-the same name as that he had lost.
Mordakhai was able to establish a “guest house” called “Madaffa” on the land he usurped from his victims, and gathered around him a group of hypocrites who started to spread out false propaganda for him that he was a prominent Arab Sheikh. He plotted against Sheikh Saleh Salman Abdulla Al Tamimi, his original enemy, and plotted his assassination in the mosque of the town called Al-Zalafi.
After that, he felt satisfied and safe to make Al-Diriya his permanent home. There, he would practice polygamy at a wide scale and begot many children with Arab women whom he gave pure Arab names. In present day, polygamy is practiced fully by the House of Saud as they have many wives and children.
Ever since his descendants grew in number and power under the same name of the Saudi Clan, they have followed his steps in plotting against the Arab nation. They illegally seized rural sectors and farmlands while killing every person who tried to oppose their plans. They used deception for reaching their goals; they bought the conscience of their dissidents; they offered their women and money to influential people in that area, particularly those who started to write the true biography of the Jewish family. They bribed the writers of history in order to purify their ignominious history and to make their lineage related to the most prominent Arab tribes such as Rabi’a, Anza, and Al Masaleekh.
Mohammad Amin Al Tamimi, who is director and manager of the contemporary Libraries of the Saudi Kingdom, created a genealogical tree (family tree) for the House of Saud and connected them to Muhammad. In doing so, in 1362, he received a reward of 35 thousand Egyptian pounds from the then Saudi Ambassador to Cairo, Egypt, Ibrahim Al-Fadel.
One of Mordakhai’s sons called Al-Maraqan, arabized from the Jewish root Mack-ren, begot a son called Mohammad and later another son called Saud, which is the name of the present day Saudi Dynasty.
The descendants of Saud started a campaign of assassination of the prominent leaders of the Arab tribes with the idea that those leaders were apostates who were deviating from the Islam and abandoning the laws of the Qur’an.
In the History Book of the Saudi Family pages 98-101, their private family historian declares that the Saudi dynasty considers the people of Najd blasphemous. Therefore, they see that their blood must be shed, their properties confiscated, and their females taken as concubines. No Muslim is deemed authentic in his or her belief unless he or she belongs to the sect of Abdul Wahhab (whose origins are also Jewish from Turkey.) His doctrines give authority to the Saudi Family to destroy villages with all their male inhabitants including children, to sexually assault their women, stab the bellies of the pregnant, cut off the hands of their children, and then burn them. They are further authorized by such a brutal doctrine to plunder all the properties of who they call renegades; those who are not followers of Wahhabism. The Saudi Family have committed all of these acts for the sake of Wahhabism for hundreds of years since 1163 A.H. They are known for killing those who even remotely criticize them of their political corruption or greed in wealth. If the House of Saud doesn’t kill them, their ardent and extreme followers and supporters will harass or even kill that person.
In the 1960’s the “Sawt al Arab ” Broadcasting Station in Cairo, Egypt, and the Yemen Broadcasting Station in Sana’a confirmed the Jewish ancestry of the Saudi family.
King Faisal Al-Saud not deny his family’s Jewish ties; declaring to the Washington Post on Sept.17, 1969 stating: “We, the Saudi Family, are cousins of the Jews: we entirely disagree with any Arab or Muslim Authority which shows any antagonism to Jews; but we must live together with them in peace. Our country (Arabia) is the fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world.”
Hafez Wahbi, the Saudi legal advisor, mentioned in his book entitled “The Peninsula of Arabia” that King Abdul Aziz A-Saud, who died in 1953, had said: “Our message (Saudi Massage) encountered the opposition of all Arab Tribes. My grandfather, Saud Awal, once imprisoned a number of the Sheikhs of Matheer Tribe; and when another group of the same tribe came to intercede for the release of the prisoners, Saud Awal gave orders to his men to cut off the heads of all the prisoners, then, he wanted to humiliate and derogate the interceders by inviting them to eat from a banquet he prepared from the cooked flesh of his victims whose cut off heads he place in the top of the food platters! The interceders became so alarmed and declined to eat the flesh of their relatives, and, because of their refusal to eat, he ordered his men to cut off their heads too.”
Hafez Wahbi further states that King Abdul Aziz Al-Saud related that story to the Sheikhs of the Matheer Tribes, who visited him in order to intercede for their prominent leader at that time, Faisal Al Darweesh, who was the king’s prisoner. He related that story to them in order to prevent them from interceding for the release of their Sheikh; otherwise, they would meet the same fate. He killed the Sheikh and used his blood as an ablution liquid from him just before he stood up for his prayer. The guilt of Faisal Darweesh at that time was that he had criticized King Abdul Aziz Al-Saud when the king signed the document which the English Authorities prepared in 1922 as a declaration for giving Palestine to the Jewish. His signature was obtained in the conference held at Al Aqeer in 1922.
(Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman and Al-Waleed bin Talal)
Throughout the last few years, Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman has gained and exercised great power and control in the transition of Saudi Arabia’s culture and society. During his reign, he has led Saudi Arabia to increasingly becoming outright Luciferian. Crown Prince bin Salman’s regime has rapidly transitioned Saudi Arabia into becoming more akin to Western society; much to the ire of traditional Saudi citizens. He is a figure in which the elites have placed in a position of power and control to not only socially engineer and transform Saudi Arabia into an overt Luciferian nation much like America but to assist the Zionists in the war against Iran and ensure America’s wealth through the oil trade.
Muhammad bin Salman’s cousin, Al-Waleed Bin Talal is also behind pushing liberalism and is a big advocate of feminism. Many of his employees are women and also made headlines by hiring the first ever female pilot in the history of Saudi Arabia. Al-Waleed bin Talal’s hands are also tied into Citigroup as he is the largst shareholder of the banking powerhouse in New York. He is also behind bankrolling social reforms and liberal agendas in Saudi Arabia. On July 1, 2015, bin Talal held a press conference announcing his intention to donate $32 billion to philanthropic causes. He stated that the funds would be used for humanitarian projects such as the empowerment of women and youth (code for feminism), disaster relief, disease eradication and building bridges of understanding between cultures (code for social reform and transformation through liberalism). He has had affiliations with the Bush family. Al-Waleed bin Talal and bin Salman and their family have helped fund both Republican and Democratic Parties in America. Al-Waleed bin Talal has given up to $25M to the Clinton Foundation. He also has ties with Barack Obama as his advisor, Khalid al-Mansour helped fund Barack Obama’s Harvard education and was instrumental in getting Obama accepted into the Harvard Law Review. Khalid al-Mansour was affiliated with Weather Underground which was a radical black nationalist movement in the late 1960s until 1977, and also was working as a lawyer for the Black Panthers. Al-Waleed bin Talal also offered $10M to New York in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 but was rebuffed by then New York Mayor Rudy Giulianni after he stated that America should re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stand toward the Palestinian cause. Considering the rebuff, it shows the push and pull relationship that Saudi Arabia has with America.
Muhammad bin Salman was also once quoted leading up to the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election as stating in private, “Saudi Arabia has always sponsored both Republican and Democratic Parties of America and the kingdom also provides with full enthusiasm 20 percent of the cost of Hillary Clinton’s campaign in the U.S. presidential elections despite the fact that some influential forces within the country don’t have a positive look toward supporting the candidate because she is a woman”.
Another Saudi group called Friends of Saudi Arabia has given the Clinton Foundation between $1 million and $5 million. Two members of the Saudi royal family have personally given between $200,000 and $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
Tony and John Podesta who are notorious pedophiles and partners of the Clinton Foundation receives $140,000 a month from the Saudi government to lobby lawmakers and federal agencies on its behalf.
Documents published by the Department of Justice under the Foreign Agents Registration Act shows that Clinton campaign financier Anthony Podesta is one of the several lobbyists at his firm personally handling the Saudi account. The Saudi Royal Court’s contact with the Podesta Group is part of a sprawling effort to prevent passage of a law that would allow victims of terrorism to sue foreign governments which have aided and abetted terrorists. The Podesta Group has helped the Saudis manage public relations during other high-profile cases as well. Following the execution in January of Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr, the firm put The New York Times in touch with a Saudi commentator named Salman al-Ansari who claimed that the Shi’ite cleric was a terrorist. Nimr was a vocal critic of the Saudi royal family and had called for free elections there.
Furthermore, Wikileaks revealed a 2009 cable by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton saying: “More needs to be done since Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Lashkar e-Tayyiba and other terrorist groups.” Instead of sanctioning the Saudis, Clinton authorized enormous quantities of weapons to be sold to Saudi Arabia. On Christmas Eve in 2011, Hillary Clinton and her closest aides celebrated a massive $29.4 billion sale to the Saudis of over 80 F-15 fighter jets, manufactured by Boeing, a company which also contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
On a side note, just to put in the perspective of who Mohammed bin Salman really is and what he and his family are about behind closed doors, he also seemingly had ties with notorious child sex-peddler and Mossad agent, Jeffrey Epstein. Upon visiting Jeffrey Epstein in his home, American journalist Edward Jay Epstein recalled seeing numerous photos of Jeffrey Epstein with the Crown Prince and the Emirate Prince Mohammed bin Zayed. Epstein suggested to him that they were clients of his.
(The Saudi Purge)
On October 30th, U.S. Senior Advisor and Zionist, Jared Kushner made a visit to Saudi Arabia. The purpose of Kushner’s meeting was for him to provide assurity to Muhammad bin Salman that America would support him and his plans to take over Saudi Arabia. He was placed in the position of Crown Prince in order to help destabilize Iran and support the Israeli state.
A few months later, the take over began. The Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri abruptly resigned while he was in Saudi Arabia. This created the pretext for the Saudi family to claim that the foreign relations between Saudi Arabia and Lebanon were increasingly strained. In November 2017, Saudi Arabia claimed Lebanon declared war between the two states, despite leaders of Lebanon stating otherwise. A few days later, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates asked their citizens to leave Lebanon. Lebanon’s president and some Lebanese officials believe that Hariri’s abrupt resignation was made under coercion by the Saudis and have claimed that the Saudis have kept him hostage. This is all apart of the bigger plan to destabilize Iran and to perpetuate a war with Iran by targeting Lebanon. Israeli Intelligence Minister Yisrael Katz called Saad Hariri’s resignation at the time a “turning point” for the Middle East, stating that “Now is the time to press and isolate Hezbollah, until it will be weakened and eventually disarmed.” Lebanon is perhaps Iran’s closest partner in diplomatic relations. In destabilizing Lebanon, it would allow Saudi Arabia and the Israelis to close in further on Iran in the hopes of establishing further Zionist influence over the neighboring regions between Iran and Saudi Arabia in favor of the House of Saud. This is the reason why Lebanon was just targeted this week in the bombing which devastated Beirut. Hezbollah, a Shia Islamist political party and militant group in Lebanon, was subsequently blamed for the incident for having tons of ammonium nitrate placed within the warehouse; prompting them to be the face of the destruction of Lebanon and to give further reasoning to target Hezbollah and dismantle Lebanon in the process.
Hezbollah are pawns as well. During Obama’s presidency, the Obama Administration allowed Hezbollah linked drug trafficking into the United States in order to secure the Iran Nuclear Deal. Just like all the other militant Arab groups, Hezbollah is partnered with America as well.
Furthermore, Eleven Saudi princes were arrested and detained along with over twenty senior officials by bin Salman’s orders and were locked in the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Riyadh. The hotel was the same hotel which hosted the Future Investment Initiative where Sophia the Robot was displayed and subsequently named a Saudi citizen. It is apparent now that bin Salman created the event in order to have all of the major princes and officials in one spot in order to set them up for their planned arrests.
After the arrests, one of the Saudi princes who were detained, Abdelaziz bin-Fahd, was killed by gunfire after resisting arrest. This particular prince was very close to the Lebanese Prime Minister as well. Soon after, Saudi prince Mansour bin Muqrin and 7 others who were ministerial and senior figures died in a helicopter crash near Yemen. It was later revealed that the helicopter was shot down by Saudi war jets because the prince was trying to flee the country.
Muhammad bin Salman locked up the Saudi officials because they were resistant to the social reforms he has planned or has been ordered to implement. The officials refused to cooperate in their allegiance to bin Salman as the Crown Prince and to invest in his projects such as the NEOM city.
The Saudi Purge was to cement Muhammad bin Salman as the plant who would transform Saudi Arabia into a progressive nation and to build further ties with the Zionists in order to isolate Iran and create greater enemies for them to help establish Zionist influence over the rest of the Middle East as apart of the “Greater Israel Plan”.
Since the early 1990s, current king of Saudi Arabia, Salman ibn Abdulaziz has been instrumental in conceiving a new national development plan; aimed to resolve the challenges following the Gulf War. This period brought popular opposition to the House of Saud and a global recession that resulted in a decrease in returns on Saudi investments worldwide. The plan outlined a social, economic and cultural change in Saudi Arabia through means of gradually decreasing the power of the religious establishment and diversifying the economy. This led to fear and angst among the Saudi people.
Salman serving as governor of Riyadh, oversaw institutions which was handled by graduates of Saudi universities. This was a sign of progression as there had been a long history of institutional incompetence within the country. It was a step upwards for the Saudi regime in the aftermath of the Gulf War.
By the mid-2000s, the biggest natural resource of Saudi Arabia became highly profitable as it’s price rose to an all-time high. This helped serve as a catalyst for the materialization of the economic and cultural plans conceived a decade earlier under the Metropolitan Development Strategy of Arriyadh Region. The Arriyadh Development Authority has helped manage the vision in which Salman outlined and helped build relationships with elites, construction moguls and employees.
In order to conceive the progression of the plan, religion was left on the backburner which provoked many Muslims and conservatives. Salman had close ties with the religious establishment and exerted his power in a tyrannical manner to manage both clerics and foot soldiers to serve his own agenda and to punish those who did not obey his orders.
Salman’s son Mohammed has echoed his claims and plans to reform the kingdom in the aspects of religion and economy. Salman himself embodied the potential undermining of what many saw as the principles of Saudi rule by building traditional alliances within the ruling family and the country’s economic elites and religious clerics. Mohammed bin Salman is continuing to carry out and execute his father’s vision in transforming the kingdom.
Upon taking the throne in 2015, at the age of 79, King Salman almost overnight reorganized government and made rapid changes to top administration in the bureaucracy. It also espoused an unprecedentedly belligerent foreign policy, the devastating effects of which have been all too tangible in Yemen, Syria, Libya, and Qatar.
Salman’s regime has also gone to great lengths to silence all forms of criticism. Not only has it criminalized opposition to the Saudi-Emirati war in Yemen and both countries’ belligerent posture toward Qatar, the regime has also indefinitely detained dozens of Saudi intellectuals, activists, religious scholars, and writers, while placing others under house arrest or on no-fly lists. However, King Salman has been ill since or even before he ascended to the throne which caused him to increasingly entrust many functions of the state to his son Mohammed, who has since centralized most powers of the state.
One of Muhammad bin Salman’s first acts was to convene a coalition of Arab states in March 2015 and lead it into war in Yemen, against the advice of many of his military generals. The war aimed to root out Ansar Allah, or the Houthis, from Sanaa in order to restore a pro-Saudi regime to power.
With Mohammed bin Salman serving as the architect of the war in Yemen, the war has been largely obscured in the mainstream media and have not been discussed for years by the American press. As mentioned before, this is due to the relationship in which Saudi Arabia has built with the United States and the Israelis. In April 2015, directly after King Salman appointed him as Crown Prince, the regime began quietly arresting hundreds of citizens, including religious scholars, preachers, writers, journalists, activists, and bureaucrats. These ranged from people who opposed the regime outright to those who called for political, economic, and other reforms, even if within an Al Saud–led state. Those familiar with Saudi regime tactics understood these wide-ranging arrests as punitive and a prelude to unpopular policy changes, about which the regime wanted to silence and preempt all forms of criticism and dissent.
(Saudi Arabia and Iran)
On January 2, 2016, the Saudi regime executed renowned Shiite cleric and Al Saud critic sheikh Nimr al-Nimr, three other Saudi Arabian Shiite activists, and Sunnis who were accused of participating in Al Qaeda terrorist attacks in the kingdom. The political executions led to an escalation of the regime’s repression of Shiite activism. Facing failure of an immediate takeover in Yemen, the Saudi regime used the executions to project a semblance of power while seeking to terrorize the Shiites of Saudi Arabia’s oil-rich Eastern Province into submission. The regime was aimed at Iran. The message was that there was little Mohammed would not do to confront Iran, even if it meant making government relations with the Shiites of Saudi Arabia worse. As a result, Saudi-Iranian relations deteriorated.
By mid-2017, as the Crown Prince’s economic and political ventures came under criticism, he began a new war against the Shiite inhabitants of Awamiyya in the Eastern Province. Awamiyya is the grounds of the executed sheikh Nimr al-Nimr as well as many of the activists in opposition to the regime- maintaining peaceful mobilizations against the regime since 2011. In early May of 2017, a few months after announcing its intentions to “redevelop” the neighborhood, the regime began destroying al-Musawara which was an old neighborhood in Awamiyya where 3,000 Saudis lived. Without consulting the people of the town first, the regime ordered residents to evacuate; providing them with temporary insufficient housing in a nearby town. It then sent in their contractors with their bulldozers to demolish the neighborhood. Security forces used live fire against peaceful protesters and killed several of those who had refused to evacuate their homes. Armed confrontations ensued, and the regime escalated its campaign by shelling the neighborhood and killing 12–25 people before the last inhabitant managed to escape.
By demolishing and reconstructing the town, the regime would uproot some of the most radical anti–Al Saud activists while also opening up a new investment frontier to Salman’s companies and those of his allies. The current regime relies on such ventures in order to deal with a fledgeling economy and financial duress. Throughout the 20th century, most of the Shiite towns in the east were actively ignored by the construction drive of the Saudi state. These underdeveloped towns now constitute new investment frontiers for a cash-hungry regime that at once sought to assert its control over Shiite neighborhoods. Indeed, this was not simply about sectarianism or flexing the regime’s muscles in the face of growing regional challenges. But, driven by financial motivations, the regime nonetheless justified its military assault on people and infrastructure in the name of counterterrorism.
In the past, the scale and mode of such violence has usually been limited to Saudi Arabia’s Shiite population. As the bombs dropped on al-Musawara, with the aim of “redeveloping” the town, the regime also intensified its silencing campaign across the country. It arrested hundreds more Saudis who were still skeptical of regime policies or called for serious reforms. Those included writers, intellectuals, bureaucrats, and preachers. Not only were they arrested, but their families were also regularly terrorized through armed house searches, if not by direct threats. Several cultural producers who simply refused to voice their support for domestic and regional policies met a similar fate. For the latter, remaining silent came at great cost. The regime, however, especially bore down on the most popular of the (Sunni) Islamist movements in Saudi Arabia, the Sahwa. Calling for constitutionalism, civil rights, and political reform, the Sahwa had threatened successive Saudi regimes since the 1991 Gulf War. Salman’s regime was no different, and the Sahwa especially targeted Mohammed’s corruption, economic policies, and unwillingness to embark on political reform. They saw these as further disenfranchising the Saudi population, its youth in particular. It was also around this same time that the Saudi and Emirati regimes escalated tensions with Qatar, accusing the neighboring state of supporting the Muslim Brotherhood—which has historically challenged the legitimacy of Wahhabism and the Al Saud monarchy—and what they saw as fundamentalist Islamist groups in the region.
Informal relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel can be traced back to the 1960s, when Israel militarily assisted King Faisal’s regime in his proxy war against Gamal Abdel Nasser in Yemen (1962–70).
These relations further improved under King Abdullah, who ruled from 2005 until his death in 2015. During this period, Saudi-Israeli relations were becoming more of an unspoken reality. In 2006, Abdullah’s regime blatantly sided with Israel in its war on Lebanon, in which 1,109 were killed, the vast majority of them civilians, 4,400 were injured, and over 1 million were displaced. It also supported Israel in its brutal wars on Gaza in 2008–9, 2012, and 2014. It was during Abdullah’s reign that officials from both countries began expressing cordiality toward each other in public for the first time. Prince Turki al-Faisal—Saudi Arabia’s former director of general intelligence and former ambassador to London and Washington—was, and still is, the face of Saudi-Israeli rapprochement. Such overtures have only increased and become more official since Salman ascended the throne.
The Saudi regime’s pro-Israel propaganda was even more cemented when Mohammed bin Salman allegedly said in a meeting of Jewish organizations in New York in March 2018 that Palestinians should “agree to come to the negotiations table or shut up and stop complaining.” However, the Saudis in public support Palestinians and see Israel as an illegitimate colonial state. Saudi socialization mechanisms have favored Palestine in the building of Saudi identity and in the state-sanctioned historical narrative and history textbooks. While the House of Saud and administrations in Riyadh were paying lip service to the importance of freeing Palestine, the Saudi regimes were holding secret talks with Israel, and in various instances, doing its bidding across the Arab world, often at the expense of Palestinians. This has been the case across the Gulf as well. Yet few inside Saudi Arabia will or have been able to voice concern or criticism of the establishment of formal ties with the Israeli state.
The painting, the Salvator Mundi, was painted by Leonardo da Vinci- who was an outright homosexual and pederast. Leonardo has made many paintings which are allusions to Luciferianism and paganism such as painting the John the Baptist with his index finger upwards in homage to Jupiter.
The painting is supposed to be an image of Christ but it is in truth a painting of the Christ on the left hand side which is the Antichrist. As you can see in the painting, the figure is demonstrating the “as above, so below” gesture. He is holding in his left hand a crystal ball; an object used in witchcraft and sorcery for the purpose of clairvoyance and scrying. While the crystal ball is supposed to provide the user with images intended to be of the future or to signal them to make important decisions based off the images, the images they see are in actuality their subconscious desires manifested onto the crystal ball.
He also has a feminine aura with long hair and a seemingly low cut dress. It adds onto the theme of the Pan which is blurring the lines of gender. While Pan does overtly have feminine and masculine sex organs, the figure in the painting expresses the synthesis of genders in a more subtle way with the man wearing a dress.
The figure’s facial features also seem to be modeled after da Vinci’s student, Salai who was also his lover. Keep in mind that Salai was ten years old when he entered da Vinci’s household. Salai was used as the model for Bacchus, Saint John the Baptist and believe it or not, the Mona Lisa itself.
In 2017, the painting was put up for auction at Christie’s- a major British auction house held under the umbrella group, Groupe Artémis owned by French billionaire, François-Henri Pinault and houses other major luxury powerhouses such as Gucci, Saint Laurent, and Balenciaga. Often times, these major auction events in which billionaires and other rich investors spend millions of dollars are fronts for human trafficking, money laundering and drug smuggling all under the guise and cover of “heavy security” for the painting. Either way, the painting was sold in 2017 at the Christie’s auction house for a record breaking $450.3M. The buyer was said at the time to be Muhammad bin Salman. With this in mind, why would a supposed Muslim prince of the most powerful Muslim Royal Family in the Arab world purchase a painting which is allegedly supposed to be a portrait of a figure of Christianity? On the surface, it makes no sense whatsoever. The House of Saud and it’s laws on the surface are the most strict governing bodies of Islam in the world- executing those who make even the slightest offense against Islam. It is so strict that people have not even been able to openly play music in the streets without facing persecution. If the House of Saud were such vehement followers of Islam as it is believed, why would they dare to let their own people know that their Crown Prince spent such an exorbitant amount of money on an alleged painting of Christ? This shows you that the House of Saud are not followers of Islam at all. As stated before, Abdul Wahhab was not a person who adhered to Islam and instead formed his own sect which is a perverted form of Islam to glorify himself. Rich Muslim emperors of Saudi Arabia, Brunei and Qatar, impose strict laws on their own people meanwhile they can do whatever they want as they please. It is hypocrisy at its finest all for the sake of having full control and power to do as they see fit upon their own people.
This is all apart of a further plan for Saudi Arabia to come out of the woodworks and show a more overt Luciferian image upon their country. This is further shown in the plans for creation of the mega-city NEOM.
In April 2016, Mohammed announced Vision 2030, a national blueprint that aimed to implement an overhaul of everyday life in Saudi Arabia. Vision 2030 focuses on the reorganization of the economic, infrastructural, social, and cultural aspects in the Saudi kingdom. Focusing on diversifying the Saudi economy, it lauded the alleged role that a predominantly young Saudi population would play in achieving this vision. It touted the new and open lifestyle it would enable which would help better accommodate Saudi youth. This regime to bring accommodation to “Saudi youth” is only to help legitimize its authoritarian schemes. The middle class has been shrinking while the poverty rates have increased- much like in America. It is all apart of the plan to modernize the country by breaking down the middle class, inflating the work pool with more people to make the workers be paid less and to promote feminism to cause discord within society.
The Vision 2030 plan is all a marketing ploy to make Saudi Arabia more palletable to it’s citizens and to serve as the reason for all of it’s drastic decisions for the sake of improving the country. Questions arose as to how an inflated bureaucracy would process a backlog of millions of housing applications and at the same time increase employment rates when thousands of Saudis had already lost their jobs in the year prior. In 2017, the regime announced that it would not balance the budget by 2020 as it said it would but instead postponed the deadline to 2023. Saudis have been alarmed about the prospects of the regime’s squandering the proceeds of a potential Aramco IPO for the sake of these projects, thereby jeopardizing the country’s most efficient company and its only reliable source of income.
On October 2017 at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Riyadh, Mohammed announced plans to build a $500 billion high-tech megacity which was named NEOM, on Saudi Arabia’s northwestern coast, calling it a lucrative global investment opportunity and sociotechnical experiment rooted in religious tolerance and sustainable development (the very words in which the United Nations use for their 2030 plan). It was his pitch as the solution to Saudi Arabia’s problems. Simultaneously, as security forces intensified the countrywide silencing campaign, the crown prince convened hundreds of foreign dignitaries, investors, business leaders, journalists, and public-relations experts, among other speakers, at the Future Investment Initiative.
The megacity was set to be built in the northern desert coast of the Red Sea; largely because it was designated as a military zone close to Israel and Egypt during the war in the 1960s. The Saudi regime had taken this land and claimed it for its NEOM project without even compensating those who had ownership over the land. The claimants of the land have sought compensation from the Saudi regime but have not received any until now.
By creating this megacity in the Red Sea in the west, it signifies a shift of tradition from the state’s wealth in the oil-rich Persian gulf to a more futuristic epicenter of economic wealth from technology and science. It has also been used as a mechanism to help assuage the country’s opposition towards Israel in order to bring acceptance to their ties through the Saudi media.
NEOM has promised geopolitical restructuring, along with technological, cultural, and economic advancement. It is an alluring project designed to pull in a global audience of investors, politicians, planners, and cultural producers. These foreign investors willfully ignore the forms of violence that have conventionally undergirded similar reformist claims in Saudi Arabia for the sake of banking off on the Saudi regime’s development projects and getting a slice of the pie. By doing so, it only reinforces and enables the Saudi family’s treatment of it’s citizens and tyrannical control.
Unlike earlier megacities that Abdullah’s regime sponsored, NEOM has had the added aspect of being driven by an unpopular ruler who, facing domestic opposition, foreign-policy failures, and a financial crisis, must create global support to ensure his own survival, both politically and financially. To increase investor confidence, Mohammed bin Salman has promised that he will run state affairs differently. A week after announcing NEOM, he revealed an anti-corruption campaign that in its first two days arrested princes, bureaucrats, military leaders, and business tycoons which was dubbed “the Saudi purge”. Mohammed used the media to broadcast these high-profile arrests in order to showcase his commitment to fighting corruption but also to force the political, economic, and military elites into submission, and the rest of the population to his regime.
To have such a city as projected in NEOM shows the lengths in which Saudi Arabia has been willing to go to proclaim it’s Luciferianism. American consultants, hired by the city’s developers came up with a 2,300 page proposal that wants to make Neom largely run by robots. Other things are flying taxis, glow-in-the-dark sand, cloud seeding to create rain in the desert, robotic maids, MMA-style robot cage fights, and an island with robot dinosaurs. It’s most ambitious plan is to have an artificial moon made from a fleet of drones that would light up every night and live-stream images straight from outer space. The city would run on wind and solar energy and be a hub for technological and medical innovation.
The absurdity of such creations in a city shows the level of arrogance and pervasiveness of the Luciferian mentality within the Saudi family. By creating robots, it is man’s way of playing the Creator. It was during the Investment Initiative where Sophia the Robot was introduced and given Saudi citizenship. It is all apart of the advancement of artificial intelligence in society across the world which has been planned for within the past century. For being such strict and extreme Muslims, it seems a bit odd that they would think it as just to create robots and favor architecture over the lands, doesn’t it? The plans to build their own moon only adds onto that point. If the moon was such an anomaly in the scientific world, why is it feasible for man to be able to build a moon of their own? It only adds onto the fact that the moon and the sun are not what they are played up to be. The fact of the matter is that the NEOM city is not only outright Luciferian but if it were to have been fully built, it would serve as the child of Babylon.
The House of Saud are not real Arabs nor are they even real Muslims. They are Jewish imposters and participate in the same occultic practices of pedophilia, murder, and pagan belief systems just like the ruling figures of America and Europe are.
(Warning: Explicit. Do not eat while reading this section of the article.)
Finally, the worst is saved for last; Dubai.
Dubai is one of, if not the most despicable places on the planet. Every fornication that you can think of takes place in Dubai. Despite the fact that the United Arab Emirates is an Islamic state which has strict laws and regulations for its citizens concerning homosexuality, sexual promiscuity, women’s attire, and infidelity, it is perhaps the biggest hub for human trafficking, sex trade, organ trafficking and pedophilia.
Often times, Instagram models will travel to Dubai to service rich Arab men for fulfill whatever desires they please in exchange for money. The models have their flight and expenses paid for. They are not participating in any regular sex whatsoever.
The women are paid typically at least $10k or more a night to have sex with rich Arab men. The models often get urinated and shat on by these men. One story stated by an Instagram model who did these services stated that after just one of the several men she agreed to have sex with ejaculated on her face, she was placed in the bathroom by their servant to await the men before with clear instructions not to clean her face. She waited until the men arrived. Three men from the group arrived naked and all urinated on her face as the way to clean the semen off of her face. She was compensated with $10k for the night.
If that wasn’t disgusting enough, the next night, she had sex with only one of the men. The bed had a plastic covering over it. Upon the climax, the man squatted down and shat all over her chest. His feces splattered onto her face and into her mouth; causing her to throw up and turn away from which angered him. He slapped her and told her if she did not stay still, he would not pay her the $30k in which they had agreed upon. She continued to throw up because his feces were in her mouth. In the end, she was not paid the $30k.
The sheikhs often purposefully consume laxatives before the act. In a humorous manner, the sheikhs or other rich Arab men would often joke amongst each other and bet money on who would excrete the most.
The models sometimes also drink the urine or consume the feces of the men during the act. Another practice in which women do in Dubai is figging which is the act of putting a shaved ginger root into the anus. It creates a burning sensation around the sphincter and a cooling sensation at the same time. They agree to have sex with animals, as well as perform salmonphilia upon the men which is the insertion of salmon into their anus.
Here is an account of an Instagram model who openly spoke and seemingly bragged about her experiences in Dubai and sexual services with rich Arab men. Most of these models simply don’t care or feel bad about their experiences because they think the money serves as justification for it. Please understand that I am not claiming that any of of these women are victims. I am only bringing this to the forefront to expound upon the depravity and filth which occurs in Dubai.
“These guys are so rich, hate their wives and bored with life they are willing to pay anything for their crazy sex fetishes and I was crazy enough to expect the money. I’ve had to be gangbanged and bukkaked by over 20 Saudi royalty at once (made 40K) in two days so it was worth it. I’ve literally been pissed on and shitted on so many times I just don’t understand why they like it (after the 3rd time you get shit on you get use to it). I’ve had to have sex with a male German Shepard dog in front of them, I’ve had to stick numerous objects in my ass and their asss as well, I’ve got paid to eat shit, I’ve got paid to get beat up, I even had to stick a live Salmon in some 65 year olds man ass…
I’ve had sex with their 14 year old boys to make them men, I’ve drank cups of cm and have smeared my face with their shit. So to all you ladies that are going to bash me. I’m 24 years old and have 1 million dollars liquid in my bank account. I’m now retired and can have normal sex with whomever I want.”
This goes to show you that this really does occur and has been going on for years. This is not limited to just Instagram models. This also goes for struggling or even affluent Hollywood actresses and actors who go to Dubai to perform these very same acts in order to get money to keep themselves afloat or for the purpose of self-gratification.
Tyrese has been a frequent visitor of Dubai for quite some time now. Tyrese like many other celebrities have performed gay sex and pedophile acts with Arab men and trafficked boys. Some of the boys are below the ages of five. Sometimes, they may even be infants or toddlers. It is a hub for Hollywood celebrities to partake in pedophilia and to perform child sacrifice rituals. It is not a stretch to say that rituals in extracting adrenochrome from children also takes place in Dubai as well.
Young boys have also been trafficked over the years into the United Arab Emirates for the purpose of being used as camel jockeys.
For years, Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, the former ruler of Dubai, had turned a blind eye to the traditional practice, which abducted children as young as two and forced them to ride camels due to their light weight. Some of the children were sold to the camel racing companies by poor parents who wanted extra money. The families did not get much back from this. By the time the agents had taken half of the child’s wages, there was barely any money left back home for their families.
Inside the camel farms, the children were put to work, exercising the camels and doing chores. They were starved to keep their weight low, beaten, and sexually abused. When they were put on camels during races, some died after falling from the camel. Other boys were trampled to death by other camels. Sheikh Mohammed allowed this practice to continue for years and only stopped it after immense international pressure and outrage.
In recent time, they have been slowly being replaced by robot jockeys.
It is estimated that as many as 30,000 sex workers are in Dubai. Women from Syria, Iraq, Russia, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Romania, Moldova, Transnistria, Ukraine, Ethiopia, Somalia, Uganda, Morocco, India, China, the Philippines, Iran, Pakistan and others are reportedly trafficked to the UAE. Women are often lured into coming to Dubai for the promises of making good pay but end up having to partake in prostitution to survive. It is a center for prostitution and sex tourism. Sex services in the country are openly advertised on websites and social media. Most of the victims had been offered a job as a receptionist in a hotel or as a secretary in the United Arab Emirates while still in their native lands. They are often lured to the country by a friend or family member and don’t suspect anything. After being brought there, they are told they have to be the company to older Arab men for sexual services. They are thrust into the game of prostitution right away. With the laws intact, it is nearly impossible for women who suffered sexual abuse or rape to get justice in Dubai. They will often be charged with the crime for having sex outside of marriage and would be sent to jail. Shelters have been created by the National Committee to Combat Human Trafficking in the UAE. Maitha al-Mazrouei, a shelter employee says helping victims of sexual abuse is something new in the Gulf region; stating that “Most people don’t know that prostitutes are often forced. It’s still a big taboo.”
Dubai is also a center for drug trafficking. Models are often used to bring in drugs into the country. Drugs such as opium, heroin, cocaine, hashish and crystal meth are often smuggled into the country. These drugs are commonly used for the grand wild parties in Dubai which are filled with prostitutes, sex workers, and models.
It is not far fetched for Instagram models to smuggle drugs. Two Instagram models, Isabelle Lagace and Melina Roberce, were caught smuggling cocaine on a yacht to Australia. The two models in question were reportedly apart of a cartel and were caught with an estimated 95 kilograms of cocaine, stowed in their suitcases. The value of the drugs was estimated to be over $20M.
According to the CIA’s website, in reference to the drug trade in the UAE, it states, “The UAE is a drug transshipment point for traffickers given its proximity to Southwest Asian drug-producing countries; the UAE’s position as a major financial center makes it vulnerable to money laundering; anti-money-laundering controls improving, but informal banking remains unregulated.”
It is one of the more lucrative businesses which has served as the underbelly of much of Dubai’s wealth. It is highly likely that the models or sex workers who smuggle the drugs are underage. It is possible that for the more discreet and rich clients, the girls are forced to smuggle in the drugs by swallowing small bags of the drugs and then vomitting it up.
In 2017, a massive drug bust took place in 3 separate countries, as police synchronized their efforts to crack down on individuals in Dubai, Australia, and the Netherlands all at the same time. The famous “Ibrahim Brothers” were behind the multi-million dollar drug ring along with three others. All of them were arrested in Dubai. They were running the entire operation from Dubai, and they were probably laundering their drug money through the city’s corrupt banks. They were extradited back to Australia, their country of birth, where they will face a maximum sentence of a life behind bars for their crimes. These people were allowed to operate their business for so long most likely because they were supplying their drugs to powerful rich clients.
Dubai is often lauded for its architecture and skyscrapers by those who look at the skyline with admiration. These new buildings are constantly being built, and the city is in a constant upward spiral. Around 2009, Dubai was hit with a recession which brought construction to a standstill and the city recovered after climbing out of massive debt; managing to erect one of the biggest skyscrapers in the world, the Burj Khalifa. While all these buildings are nice and all, the cost of building these monuments at such accelerated rates have impacted the lives of many men.
Dubai’s treatment of their migrant workers has long been criticized. People from poor countries are flown into Dubai and are immediately tasked with building all of the skyscrapers. More than 88.5% of UAE residents are foreign workers and South Asian migrants make up 42.5% of the UAE’s workforce.
These migrants are usually illiterate and come from impoverished rural communities in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Advertisements offer them $300 a month, food and accomodations in exchange for manual labour from 9AM to 5PM for five days a week. In response, out of desperation, they move to Dubai hoping to earn enough money to send home to their families. In an illegal act, they take up loans of up to $3K from recruitment agencies to cover their visa fees and flight.
Upon arrival, they are driven to sordid towns on the outskirts of Dubai where 45 men share one outdoor bathroom and 10 or more people sleep in a room. Their passports are immediately confiscated and are told that they will actually be working 14 hour days, six or seven days a week, in the desert sun instead of the 8 hour days, five days a week schedule in which they had agreed upon prior to their arrival in Dubai.
There have been regular allegations of human rights offenses when it comes to the workers. Many workers are underpaid, undertrained, and undervalued. After the workers have their passports taken away from them, they are forced to work against their will if they ever want to leave the country. Not only do they have to live in dreadful conditions, but most of the time, their agreed-upon wages are never honoured. Their wages are withheld sometimes for months on end in order to make sure that the worker doesn’t quit. They are also woefully underpaid; receiving about $175 a month in comparison to the per capita income of over $2K a month. This puts the migrant workers into a situation where they have to work for however long it may take with their employers in order to pay off their debts and will be unable to send money home to their families which is the reason why they took the job in the first place.
The Kafala system in Dubai helps engineer and enable slavery in Dubai. In Arabic, Kafala means ‘sponsorship’. A kafeel means a ‘sponsor’. This is a system in the Gulf countries which gives private companies and citizens the privilege of responsibility and oversight of their workers instead of the government.
While it may seem ideal to not have the government overseeing the workplace to some, it truly isn’t; especially in a place like the UAE. When the government are supervising their workers, the employers are required to follow laws which pertain to the rights of the employee; giving the employee more freedom to quit, ask for raises, and be assisted whenever there is a case of misconduct at the workplace. In contrast, the Kafala system requires workers to receive permission from their employer if they want to change jobs. To restrict the employee’s options even further, it also requires a minimum of two years working for the same person or company. This helps enable wage suppression as there is effectively no competition and the rules are practically being enforced and established by the employer himself. The workers’ exit visa is also under the control of their kafeel which confines the worker to their present place and is put into a situation where they cannot leave the country without their employer’s permission.
With such a system in place, it makes the workers vulnerable to abuse and exploitation, with migrant workers in Dubai being at the total mercy of their employers. In addition, the Kafala system provides no protection for the workers.
The Kafala system does not allow workers to dispute employers’ nonperformance of contracts, nor does it allow them to escape a potentially abusive situation. If a worker is caught trying to escape their employer then they are brought back immediately to the same employer.
If this isn’t slavery, then what is it?
The official UAE Labour Law website itself acknowledges that ‘it puts workers in vulnerable situations where they are dependent on their employer, which often leads to exploitation and abuse with little ability to seek outside assistance.’
It shows you that the underbelly of Dubai is riddled with crime, exploitation of poor workers, abuse, and more.
As it is known, Dubai is a hub for money laundering and corruption. but just where does all of that money come from? While it’s true that some of the cash comes from the mafia, drug and diamond smuggling, the cash also comes from funding terrorism. An Afghan official admitted that $10M is smuggled out of Afghanistan every day in suitcases. These shipments make their way to Dubai, and are laundered and put into bank accounts where they can be used to finance various operations. The money itself comes from the heroin trade which originates from Afghanistan’s poppy fields. The Taliban have been the ones who have controlled this crop.
The money that comes from Afghanistan goes to Dubai, and once it is laundered, it is pumped back into the Taliban’s operations, thus funding terrorism both in the Middle East and across the world. It’s been established that money from Dubai was wired into the bank account of one of the people responsible for the 9/11 terror attacks, and this money was used to pay his expenses while he was in America.
The UAE has been listed as a place used by investors to raise funds to support militants in Pakistan as well. Businesses based in the UAE have been implicated in the funding of the Taliban and the Haqqani network.
So like their neighbor Saudi Arabia, they are also apart of funding and carrying out CIA operations like the Taliban to perpetuate the false wars in which are played up for the public. Groups like Al-Qaeda, Taliban and ISIS are always formed and given weaponry and resources by the very same people who claim that they are in war with. Wars have always been created in order to create the money for the world economy. The banks are the first ones to profit off of all the wars. So the UAE clearly are puppets doing the bidding of the banking families who own the banks to their country; that being the Rothschilds.
The last part of the Dubai section comes to discuss the ruling Al-Maktoum Family. Like the House of Saud, they flaunt their wealth and have a public image of extravagance; taking pleasure in luxury, horse-back riding and camel riding. It is expected that the royal family will present exorbitant amounts of wealth and allow its highest earning citizens to do the same within their own cities and to indulge in all forms of debauchery and depravity.
The Al Maktoum family are descendants of the Bani Yas tribe of the area in which is now called the UAE. The Bani Yas tribe were the most powerful and strategic of the familial tribes of ancient Arabia. In 1833, around 800 members of the Al Maktoum family branched away from the main Bani Yas family and took over the Emirates or region of Dubai and established themselves as the ruling family of this area. Without any opposition, the Al Maktoum family has ruled Dubai ever since and has now established themselves as the royal family with titles of Sheikh. The Sheikh of Dubai now also serves as the Vice President of the UAE, while also serving as the de facto Prime Minister and Defense Minister.
The Al Maktoum dynasty also has a long history steeped in piracy. The Persian Gulf has always been a hotspot for piracy, and . Back in the 1800s, wars with pirates were ongoing. Some of the ruling families of the UAE today are descended from pirates, and they were such a strong presence that the British tried numerous times to sign treaties with them to reduce it.
The pirates of this era were heavily involved in the slave trade where they would often take white sailors and civilians such as women and children as slaves. This “white slave trade” in the Emirate region has rarely ever been discussed. The Maktoum clan were a strong force even during that point in time. During the 1800s, only after continued efforts from Britain did they agree to reduce the piracy in that area.
It seems that the Al Maktoum family have kept to the tradition of owning slaves. According to a lawsuit filed in the United States in 2006 by six parents of children who were caught up in the slave ttrade, Dubai’s ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum was among the most active participants in the slave trade for camel racing. As mentioned before, children are enslaved and forced to work as camel jockeys. The Sheikh had a major hand in personally enslaving the children himself. Him and his brother Hamdan as well as 500 other people were said to have been involved in trafficking boys as young as two from South Asia and Africa.
The suit claimed that the Dubai royals, who have global racing interests, were especially complicit, stating that, “As makers of the de facto rules of the sport, as hosts of the camel races, and with the knowledge that the source of child camel jockeys was the slave trade … they caused the enslavement of boys by other sheikhs and conspired with them to enslave boys.”
With that being public knowledge, it is quite obvious that they are doing far worse than that behind closed doors. With the pervasiveness of pedophilia and modernized slavery in Dubai, it is no question that the Dubai royals use BETA sex kittens and other child sex slaves raised in the MK Ultra programming for their own pleasure and self-gratification. In addition, with the rituals which take place chiefly in Dubai where celebrities and politicians and others have partaken in depraved rituals involving child rape and blood sacrifices, it should be understood that the Dubai royals take part in the same rituals as well. To be such a prestigious and wealthy ruling family, they must partake in such rituals. In what is known as “The Ninth Circle Cult”, numerous ruling families, government officials, and politicians from Europe, Australia, Canada and America partake in human hunting parties, infant rape, child sacrifice, cannibalism, blood-drinking, and dismemberment. The Bush Family and the House of Windsor have been noted as people who have been present at such rituals. Considering the ties in which the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia has to America and Great Britain, it is obvious that they are involved in the same practices.
My last point concerning Dubai is to discuss their most profound monument which is the Burj Khalifa. Standing at 829.8 meters tall, it is the tallest building in the world. I bring this up because this is reminiscent of the Tower of Babel.
Genesis 11:4 states, “And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.”
This is of course in reference to when the people came to the land of Shinar and planned to build the Tower of Babel which caused The Most High to confound the people and for different tribes of people to speak their own different languages as punishment to divide the world.
With Dubai doing the same thing as the people did in biblical times in building such a monument, they are performing the same Babylonian ritual of proclaiming themselves as above the Most High and that they are their own gods.
The Dubai royals are clearly adherents to the same Babylonian rituals and practices established Cush and Nimrod which has fueled all of the world’s major empires throughout history.
The takeaway is that the Arab world has the blood of millions of Hebrews and Africans on their hands through thousands of years of wars, violence, slavery, death, rape, mutilation and torture. It is ripe with corruption in ties with the Zionist Israelis. All of Saudi Arabia’s actions are in accordance with dismantling their state through Wahhabism in order to bring opposition against Islam to create the pretext of the Israelis to build Zionist influence and further control over the Middle East. Iran as stated is the target because they remain the biggest threat to the plan of the elites to build Zionist control by establishing a Rothschild owned Central Bank in Iran. The same situation is happening in Asia with North Korea with America’s other pawns, South Korea and Japan.
The actions of the Arab ruling families is linked to their bloodline; being mixed with Jewish bloodlines. The actions of Arabs and tyrannical Muslims today towards Hebrews and Africans stems from the same envy and disdain in which Ishmael harbored toward his half-brother, Isaac. The deception and tyranny of the Arab world has gone on before even the Jewish people built influence within the world. The powers of the Arab world will continue to exert their power and to commit atrocities across the world until they are stopped. The powers that be will only be truly stopped by heavenly means. It is certain that those of the elites in the Arab world who have committed these depraved acts and other Arabs who have oppressed Hebrews and Africans for thousands of years will have alot to answer for very soon.
(On a personal note, to all the Hebrews and Africans who have read this, as an Arab man, I sincerely apologize to you for what my people have done to you over the course of history. I am humbled and honored to be among you serving the Most High Yahweh Elohim and Son Yahweh Ben Yahweh and for us to be among each other to help edify and uplift one another. Barakatha)
1} Credit to: iabolish.org for information on slave trade.